共和国
遏制与对抗 豆瓣
作者: 吕桂霞 出版社: 社会科学文献出版社 2007 - 7
《遏制与对抗:越南战争期间的中美关系(1961-1973)》在吸收国内外学术界关于中美关系研究最新成果的基础上,以越南抗美战争(1961-1973)为背景,以1960年代到1970年代初期中美关系的冷热变化为主线,勾画了中美之间从对抗走向缓和的历史演变过程,探讨了这一特定时期中美关系变迁的原因、特点以及对国际政治格局变迁的影响,为我们正确处理和更好地发展全球化时代的大国间关系,尤其是中美关系提供了有益的启示。《遏制与对抗:越南战争期间的中美关系(1961-1973)》不仅具有较高的学术价值,而且对于中美关系的发展具有积极的现实意义。
Maoism and Grassroots Religion 豆瓣
作者: Xiaoxuan Wang 出版社: Oxford University Press 2020 - 3
Maoism and Grassroots Religion explores grassroots religious life under and after Mao in Rui'an County, Wenzhou of southeast China, a region widely known for its religious vitality. Drawing from unexplored local state archives, records of religious institutions, memoirs, and interviews, it tells the story of local communities' encounter with the Communist revolution, and its consequences, especially competition and struggles for religious property and ritual space. Rather than being totally disrupted, Xiaoxuan Wang shows, religious life under Mao was characterized by remarkable variety and unevenness and was contingent on the interactions of local dynamics with Maoist campaigns--including land reform, the Great Leap Forward, and the Cultural Revolution. The revolutionary experience strongly determined the trajectories and development patterns of different religions, inter-religious dynamics, and state-religion relationships in the post-Mao era. Wang goes beyond the image of totalistic control and suppression, to show how Maoism is relevant to religious revitalization in the post-Mao era and, more broadly, the modern fate of Chinese religions and secularism in East Asia.
Maoism permanently altered the religious landscape in China, especially by inadvertently promoting the localization and even (in some areas) expansion of Protestant Christianity, as well as the reinvention of traditional communal religion. Contrary to the popular image of total suppression and disruption during the Mao years, this book shows that religious changes under Mao were highly complex and contingent on a confluence of political campaigns, local politics and community responses.The post-Mao religious revival had deep historical roots in the Mao years, Wang argues, and cannot be explained by contemporary economic motives and cultural logics alone. This book calls for a new understanding of Maoism and secularism in the People's Republic of China.
说书人与梦工厂 豆瓣
8.2 (13 个评分) 作者: 储卉娟 出版社: 社会科学文献出版社 2019 - 6
本书关注一个“非法”的“社会事实”:在充满盗版和抄袭的环境下,网络时代的文学生产爆发出前所未有的生命力,正日益成为娱乐文化生产的总源头,进而影响公共想象和意识形态的形成。如何理解这种法律视野中的“悖谬”,以及悖谬背后传统的法律想象与新技术生产之间的张力?本书通过对网络文学发展的整个进程的梳理,探究了著作权之于个人自由和社会繁荣的影响,法律与社会运动背后的焦虑,以及制度讨论的社会建构性意义。
忧与思 豆瓣
作者: 陈伟光 出版社: 中国社会科学出版社 2012 - 10
几年前在浙江谈义乌工会经验时,我说过改革与工会主席宿命问题,善始善终者少;
陈伟光主席的忧思录,对于我而言则是慰灵曲乃至安魂曲,回顾自己的劳工研究,初始有一种理想主义,之后却遇到平生未曾有过的风险;
有时,有人问我为什么不留在名校任教,我也曾自问同样的问题,总体上的回答曰:不后悔,真的不后悔。为什么?因为幸遇了新状态、新风貌的工人和工会主席,并且希冀着新生代、新族群。
座谈会上问陈主席,“忧”在何处?陈主席回答:行政化的体制能不能改变,特别是工会自身、工会内部对改革阻力很大,2010年省委对本田事件的态度明确,才看到希望;工会问题的实质是必须形成压力,可以借助党政或政府形成压力,真正则在于工人的觉悟和团结;特别应该警惕的是,不要以维稳为名而剥夺工人的觉悟和团结,当然这不是要搞无政府,是为了真正实现对工人权益的尊重和社会的和谐。
——冯同庆
购物凶猛 豆瓣
作者: 孙骁骥 出版社: 东方出版社 2019 - 2
一个世纪以来,消费主义的大潮让人无法独善其身,消费已经成为人们构建身份认同的渠道。本书紧扣“消费”这一线索,讲述了20世纪中国政治、经济、社会的诸多变化。在20世纪历史光影的诡谲多变中,购物和消费主义如何把这个古老的国家改造成今天的模样,消费者的集体面孔又是如何被一次 次地篡改与重塑。本书重新梳理了这背后繁复纷乱的历史线头与社会群像。
作者认为,在宏大的历史叙事之外,还隐藏着一个小体量的历史,它真实而琐碎地存在于我们的日常生活中,隐藏于每个家庭的锅碗瓢盆里,潜伏于我们目光无法达及的晦暗幽深处。由这些历史细节编织而成的,是消费主义在中国“本土化”的历史进程。每个消费者都是这段历史的见证者,他们在购物的同时,也在不知不觉中参与并改变着这段历史。
Red Revolution, Green Revolution 豆瓣
7.6 (5 个评分) 作者: Singrid Schmalzer 出版社: University of Chicago Press 2016 - 3
In 1968, the director of USAID coined the term “green revolution” to celebrate the new technological solutions that promised to ease hunger around the world—and forestall the spread of more “red,” or socialist, revolutions. Yet in China, where modernization and scientific progress could not be divorced from politics, green and red revolutions proceeded side by side.
In Red Revolution, Green Revolution, Sigrid Schmalzer explores the intersection of politics and agriculture in socialist China through the diverse experiences of scientists, peasants, state agents, and “educated youth.” The environmental costs of chemical-intensive agriculture and the human costs of emphasizing increasing production over equitable distribution of food and labor have been felt as strongly in China as anywhere—and yet, as Schmalzer shows, Mao-era challenges to technocracy laid important groundwork for today’s sustainability and food justice movements. This history of “scientific farming” in China offers us a unique opportunity not only to explore the consequences of modern agricultural technologies but also to engage in a necessary rethinking of fundamental assumptions about science and society.
“Sigrid Schmalzer creates an entirely new vision of the meaning and significance of “scientific farming” in China during the Mao era.….[A] must-read not only for modern China scholars but also for those who are interested in the history of science as political and social process, and in ongoing efforts to shed light on the possibilities of putting science to work in the service of greater equality and dignity for the world’s rural poor.”
(American Historical Review)
"At its core, this book is about socialist China's uses of science and technology to improve food production and the sociopolitical changes over time that have affected those involved in modern farming and agriculture. Cautioning that the Mao era was not one of unmitigated totalitarian oppression and ecological disaster, historian Schmalzer examines the complex relations of science and politics, raising such issues as who should be regarded as “scientists,” and how agriculture should be organized to maximize its benefits for all. Particularly interesting is the author’s investigation of the “rural scientific experiment movement." By comparing the fortunes of the “green revolution” in India and Africa, Schmalzer offers some unexpected political and social insights, contrasting US interests with those of the Chinese, who have also sought to bring their methods of agriculture and farming to third-world countries where politics is a highly visible concern on both sides of the capitalist-communist divide. Instructive and rewarding reading in recent Chinese history as well as the social politics of agriculture and farming in China and throughout the third world."
(Choice)
"Right on cue, this new work reveals the multifaceted and complex nature of science in the PRC. Red Revolution, Green Revolution looks at agricultural science and the unique and distinctive trajectory of the Chinese green revolution....demonstrates the manifold ways science filtered into the countryside and became the basis of the party’s interactions with the rural populace."
(Cross-Currents)
“Schmalzer’s reconstruction of the lived experiences of those who participated in the mass scientific experiment movement in China serves as a corrective to accounts of science in the years of the Cultural Revolution that emphasize failure, hardship, and suffering…[R]eading Red Revolution, Green Revolution productively upends one’s ideas about the nature of an agricultural experiment.”
(Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences)
“Upending familiar assumptions about the origins and consequences of the global Green Revolution, Schmalzer breaks important new ground in our understanding of modern Chinese history and the role of science in industrial agriculture. Rather than relying on misleading distinctions between modern and traditional, laboratory and field, politics and science, or even between the capitalist West and socialist East, Schmalzer convincingly draws our attention to the diversity of approaches taken in the effort to revolutionize Chinese agriculture in the 1960s and 1970s. This is a sophisticated political history from the ground up.”
(Shane Hamilton, University of Georgia)
“Writing with both elegance and precision, Schmalzer unveils the continuing imbrication of science and politics, not simply in the obviously hyperpolitical Maoist period, but also in the supposedly technologically driven Dengist era. She produces a nuanced, sophisticated description of agricultural scientific practices in the People’s Republic of China, one that challenges our assumptions about both Maoist agriculture and the Maoist period in general. Red Revolution, Green Revolution is a must-read for historians of modern China and historians of socialism, as well as historians of science and agriculture.”
(Fabio Lanza, University of Arizona)
"Agricultural science is inherently political. We may distrust the claim of technocrats and agribusiness that they conduct neutral research for the benefit of all, yet few of us would go so far as to advocate a full politicization of research, putting politics in command of laboratories and experimental fields. This, however, is what Maoist China did—and as Schmalzer demonstrates in her meticulously researched and beautifully written book, Maoist agricultural science worked, producing a socialist Green Revolution that was as impressive as the US-led Green Revolutions in India, Mexico, or the Philippines. Without romanticizing Maoist mass science, Schmalzer not only corrects the oft-repeated myth that Maoists were 'anti-science'; she shows that a different, more democratic and inclusive science was and remains possible."
(Jacob Eyferth, University of Chicago)
在利益与道德之间 豆瓣
作者: 姚泽麟 出版社: 中国社会科学出版社 2017 - 11
近二三十年来,我国城市医生职业处于一种极为尴尬的处境中:医生的(正式)收入不高、来自患者的信任缺乏、人身安全得不到保障、职业形象较为负面,甚至医学专业的招生都出现了困难。总之,医生被认为是一个“不道德”的职业群体,因为他们常常冷漠地对待病人,并且实施诱导需求、过度医疗和“防御性医疗”、收受回扣与红包等。而这种处境必然影响到医生的服务提供,也必然影响到医疗卫生体制的运行。
那么,医生职业的处境究竟如何?在这种处境中,他们又如何向民众提供医疗服务?为什么医生职业处于这种境况中?这与现行的医疗卫生体制有着怎样的关系?又对新医改产生了怎样的影响?基于以上的分析,下一步的医疗卫生体制改革又该如何展开?总而言之,为什么医生在其执业活动中不断地违反职业伦理甚至成为一种常态,从而被认为是一个“不道德”的职业群体?基于在北京的田野调查,《在利益与道德之间:当代中国城市医生职业自主性的社会学研究》对上述问题提出了一种职业社会学的解释。
对于历史,科学家有话说 豆瓣
10.0 (5 个评分) 作者: 熊卫民 出版社: 东方出版社 2017 - 2
跌宕起伏的二十世纪,中国科学界经历了哪些风雨苍黄与五味杂陈?
十六位科技知识分子于耄耋之年对中国当代历史集体发声
不同身份、地位的历史见证者从各自角度回顾他们的“私历史”,思想的碰撞,观点的冲突,让历史鲜活而有温度
2015年,屠呦呦获得诺贝尔生理或医学奖,成为中国大陆第一位获得科学类诺贝尔奖的科学家,终于圆了中国人的诺奖梦。为何建国66年才摘下科学桂冠?66年里,中国科学怎么了?中国科学家做了什么?
《对于历史,科学家有话说》内容涉及广泛,中国科学界的大事小情均有涉及,尤其当事人说当时事,让读者从科技知识分子的角度认识改革开放前的中国历史,切身感受中国科学所遭遇的是是非非,理解当下中国科学遭遇困境的原因。
相比人文知识分子,科技知识分子人数更多,是现代知识分子的主体。他们经历了跌宕起伏的二十世纪,也有很多五味杂陈的往事,还是许多国家重大事件尤其是重大生产建设活动的关键当事人。但很少有科技知识分子来书写自己的故事。对科技知识分子进行访谈,系统记录他们的话语,是保存他们的经历、见闻和见识的最佳途径。
《对于历史,科学家有话说》精选对邹承鲁、郑哲敏、施履吉等科学家以及对薛攀皋、罗登、李毓昌等科技管理者所做的比较适合大众阅读的近二十篇访谈,让科学家自己说话,重点介绍20世纪50—70年代的中国科学界,是一本既具较高史料价值,又有很强可读性的口述史作品。
一部有趣味的现代科学史 ,一本讲真话的时代备忘录
以赛先生的目光打量人性,以德先生的标尺审视过
樊洪业 姚蜀平 王作跃 丁东 饶毅 刘兵 吴国盛 傅国涌 倾情推荐
只习惯于通过堆砌文献来研究当代科学史的人们,不妨像本书作者那样直接面对历史事件的亲历者,在访谈互动中深入挖掘保存在他们头脑中的记忆。人是社会活动的主体,在考察历史事件中追寻人的真实观念和具体活动,是读懂历史的有效途径。往事因亲历而鲜活,历史因细节而生动。我相信,中国当代史的研究者和爱好者,能够从本书中获得阅读快感。(樊洪业,中国科学院研究员)
由于战乱及政治运动等原因,20世纪的历史书写相当偏颇。口述历史以抢救记忆、探求历史真相为目标,正是对其最好的弥补。这类工作既要求客观、严谨,又需高超的采访艺术——真诚、理解和敏锐的鉴别力,这些在熊卫民教授的书中都一一体现。阅读此书,不仅可以获得大量可贵信息,还是学做口述历史的极佳机会。(姚蜀平,哈佛大学费正清中国研究中心协作研究员)
熊卫民教授的这本科学家口述访谈集,不仅为学者提供了丰富、多方位、珍贵的中国近现代科技史料,而且为公众展示了当代中国科学家求学成才、参与社会的坎坷经历,读来既趣味横生又令人深思,是一本兼具历史性和故事性的难得佳作。(王作跃,美国加州理工大学普莫娜分校教授)
这是一本因讲真话而难能可贵的书。书中所记载的一些历史错误、教训或灾难从反面表明,让有专长的科学家和知识分子参与公共决策是多么的重要!法治健全的社会才能容许、保障、鼓励知识分子独立,讲良心,并提出专业意见。(饶毅,北京大学教授、《知识分子》主编)
熊卫民教授通过人物访谈记录下来的是一部活的中国现代科技史。那些激动人心的岁月,那些惨痛的教训,都有无穷的教益值得后人记取。“后人哀之而不鉴之,亦使后人而复哀后人也”,中国现代科学文化建设任重而道远。(吴国盛,清华大学教授)
熊卫民长期进行当代科学家的口述采访,他善于挖掘通向体制机理的重要细节,展示了一幅令人深思的中国科学史画卷。(丁东,文史学者)
科学家的声音淡出公众视线已久矣,这本访谈录是当代中国科学家对往事的回顾,不仅具有史料价值,而且可以看到他们与时代的互动,以及他们在20世纪后半叶承担的命运。(傅国涌,文史学者)
2017年5月29日 已读
可与《中国植物志编纂史》参看,感觉科学这一块大陆的现当代史不比文艺的料少,有人的地方就有江湖啊。咱们中国吃亏就吃亏在浪费了几十年,为了某党巩固权力什么的。另外钱学森这位高伟光的科学家着实是个嘴炮,有点丢科学精神的脸。作者最后还写了一篇方法论的文章,学风很严谨。
2017 书评 共和国 历史 口述史