当代史
Red Revolution, Green Revolution 豆瓣
7.6 (5 个评分) 作者: Singrid Schmalzer 出版社: University of Chicago Press 2016 - 3
In 1968, the director of USAID coined the term “green revolution” to celebrate the new technological solutions that promised to ease hunger around the world—and forestall the spread of more “red,” or socialist, revolutions. Yet in China, where modernization and scientific progress could not be divorced from politics, green and red revolutions proceeded side by side.
In Red Revolution, Green Revolution, Sigrid Schmalzer explores the intersection of politics and agriculture in socialist China through the diverse experiences of scientists, peasants, state agents, and “educated youth.” The environmental costs of chemical-intensive agriculture and the human costs of emphasizing increasing production over equitable distribution of food and labor have been felt as strongly in China as anywhere—and yet, as Schmalzer shows, Mao-era challenges to technocracy laid important groundwork for today’s sustainability and food justice movements. This history of “scientific farming” in China offers us a unique opportunity not only to explore the consequences of modern agricultural technologies but also to engage in a necessary rethinking of fundamental assumptions about science and society.
“Sigrid Schmalzer creates an entirely new vision of the meaning and significance of “scientific farming” in China during the Mao era.….[A] must-read not only for modern China scholars but also for those who are interested in the history of science as political and social process, and in ongoing efforts to shed light on the possibilities of putting science to work in the service of greater equality and dignity for the world’s rural poor.”
(American Historical Review)
"At its core, this book is about socialist China's uses of science and technology to improve food production and the sociopolitical changes over time that have affected those involved in modern farming and agriculture. Cautioning that the Mao era was not one of unmitigated totalitarian oppression and ecological disaster, historian Schmalzer examines the complex relations of science and politics, raising such issues as who should be regarded as “scientists,” and how agriculture should be organized to maximize its benefits for all. Particularly interesting is the author’s investigation of the “rural scientific experiment movement." By comparing the fortunes of the “green revolution” in India and Africa, Schmalzer offers some unexpected political and social insights, contrasting US interests with those of the Chinese, who have also sought to bring their methods of agriculture and farming to third-world countries where politics is a highly visible concern on both sides of the capitalist-communist divide. Instructive and rewarding reading in recent Chinese history as well as the social politics of agriculture and farming in China and throughout the third world."
(Choice)
"Right on cue, this new work reveals the multifaceted and complex nature of science in the PRC. Red Revolution, Green Revolution looks at agricultural science and the unique and distinctive trajectory of the Chinese green revolution....demonstrates the manifold ways science filtered into the countryside and became the basis of the party’s interactions with the rural populace."
(Cross-Currents)
“Schmalzer’s reconstruction of the lived experiences of those who participated in the mass scientific experiment movement in China serves as a corrective to accounts of science in the years of the Cultural Revolution that emphasize failure, hardship, and suffering…[R]eading Red Revolution, Green Revolution productively upends one’s ideas about the nature of an agricultural experiment.”
(Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences)
“Upending familiar assumptions about the origins and consequences of the global Green Revolution, Schmalzer breaks important new ground in our understanding of modern Chinese history and the role of science in industrial agriculture. Rather than relying on misleading distinctions between modern and traditional, laboratory and field, politics and science, or even between the capitalist West and socialist East, Schmalzer convincingly draws our attention to the diversity of approaches taken in the effort to revolutionize Chinese agriculture in the 1960s and 1970s. This is a sophisticated political history from the ground up.”
(Shane Hamilton, University of Georgia)
“Writing with both elegance and precision, Schmalzer unveils the continuing imbrication of science and politics, not simply in the obviously hyperpolitical Maoist period, but also in the supposedly technologically driven Dengist era. She produces a nuanced, sophisticated description of agricultural scientific practices in the People’s Republic of China, one that challenges our assumptions about both Maoist agriculture and the Maoist period in general. Red Revolution, Green Revolution is a must-read for historians of modern China and historians of socialism, as well as historians of science and agriculture.”
(Fabio Lanza, University of Arizona)
"Agricultural science is inherently political. We may distrust the claim of technocrats and agribusiness that they conduct neutral research for the benefit of all, yet few of us would go so far as to advocate a full politicization of research, putting politics in command of laboratories and experimental fields. This, however, is what Maoist China did—and as Schmalzer demonstrates in her meticulously researched and beautifully written book, Maoist agricultural science worked, producing a socialist Green Revolution that was as impressive as the US-led Green Revolutions in India, Mexico, or the Philippines. Without romanticizing Maoist mass science, Schmalzer not only corrects the oft-repeated myth that Maoists were 'anti-science'; she shows that a different, more democratic and inclusive science was and remains possible."
(Jacob Eyferth, University of Chicago)
筚路维艰 豆瓣 Eggplant.place Goodreads 谷歌图书 Goodreads
9.5 (62 个评分) 作者: 萧冬连 出版社: 社会科学文献出版社 2014 - 10 其它标题: 筚路维艰:中国社会主义路径的五次选择 / 筚路维艰
本书以简明清晰的文字对当代中国的历史轨迹做了逻辑梳理。作者认为,从执政党的建国方略、发展模式和基本政策角度考察,中国社会主义的实践路径经历了从实行新民主主义开始,途经仿效苏联模式、追寻赶超之路、发动继续革命和实行改革开放的五次历史选择。
“边缘人”纪事 豆瓣 谷歌图书
8.4 (48 个评分) 作者: 杨奎松 出版社: 广东人民出版社 2016 - 3
成功改造的旧警察 | 身败名裂的团支书 | 提心吊胆的大夫 | 疗养院里的“反革命”
自甘“堕落”的青年教师 | 爱讲怪话的文化教员 | “搞关系”的业务员 | “特嫌”缠身的技师
本书关注的是让人印象深刻的“边缘人”群体,他们很普通,人数很多,经历大多坎坷而复杂。杨奎松教授以八个出身、地域、职业、经历各不相同的“问题人物”为个案,重构他们的人生经历,从最贴近的距离,观察和体验那个时代的政治生态对普通人的影响。
2017年7月1日 已读
明清“入口气为圣人言”,新中国也要洗脑使人“入口气为革命言”。不过洗脑毕竟不是人人成功。不过一些“反革命”按如今标准来讲也不是什么好人。日记看来是写不得的,要写也别写太真。
2016 中国 中国历史 中国史 中国当代史
对于历史,科学家有话说 豆瓣
10.0 (5 个评分) 作者: 熊卫民 出版社: 东方出版社 2017 - 2
跌宕起伏的二十世纪,中国科学界经历了哪些风雨苍黄与五味杂陈?
十六位科技知识分子于耄耋之年对中国当代历史集体发声
不同身份、地位的历史见证者从各自角度回顾他们的“私历史”,思想的碰撞,观点的冲突,让历史鲜活而有温度
2015年,屠呦呦获得诺贝尔生理或医学奖,成为中国大陆第一位获得科学类诺贝尔奖的科学家,终于圆了中国人的诺奖梦。为何建国66年才摘下科学桂冠?66年里,中国科学怎么了?中国科学家做了什么?
《对于历史,科学家有话说》内容涉及广泛,中国科学界的大事小情均有涉及,尤其当事人说当时事,让读者从科技知识分子的角度认识改革开放前的中国历史,切身感受中国科学所遭遇的是是非非,理解当下中国科学遭遇困境的原因。
相比人文知识分子,科技知识分子人数更多,是现代知识分子的主体。他们经历了跌宕起伏的二十世纪,也有很多五味杂陈的往事,还是许多国家重大事件尤其是重大生产建设活动的关键当事人。但很少有科技知识分子来书写自己的故事。对科技知识分子进行访谈,系统记录他们的话语,是保存他们的经历、见闻和见识的最佳途径。
《对于历史,科学家有话说》精选对邹承鲁、郑哲敏、施履吉等科学家以及对薛攀皋、罗登、李毓昌等科技管理者所做的比较适合大众阅读的近二十篇访谈,让科学家自己说话,重点介绍20世纪50—70年代的中国科学界,是一本既具较高史料价值,又有很强可读性的口述史作品。
一部有趣味的现代科学史 ,一本讲真话的时代备忘录
以赛先生的目光打量人性,以德先生的标尺审视过
樊洪业 姚蜀平 王作跃 丁东 饶毅 刘兵 吴国盛 傅国涌 倾情推荐
只习惯于通过堆砌文献来研究当代科学史的人们,不妨像本书作者那样直接面对历史事件的亲历者,在访谈互动中深入挖掘保存在他们头脑中的记忆。人是社会活动的主体,在考察历史事件中追寻人的真实观念和具体活动,是读懂历史的有效途径。往事因亲历而鲜活,历史因细节而生动。我相信,中国当代史的研究者和爱好者,能够从本书中获得阅读快感。(樊洪业,中国科学院研究员)
由于战乱及政治运动等原因,20世纪的历史书写相当偏颇。口述历史以抢救记忆、探求历史真相为目标,正是对其最好的弥补。这类工作既要求客观、严谨,又需高超的采访艺术——真诚、理解和敏锐的鉴别力,这些在熊卫民教授的书中都一一体现。阅读此书,不仅可以获得大量可贵信息,还是学做口述历史的极佳机会。(姚蜀平,哈佛大学费正清中国研究中心协作研究员)
熊卫民教授的这本科学家口述访谈集,不仅为学者提供了丰富、多方位、珍贵的中国近现代科技史料,而且为公众展示了当代中国科学家求学成才、参与社会的坎坷经历,读来既趣味横生又令人深思,是一本兼具历史性和故事性的难得佳作。(王作跃,美国加州理工大学普莫娜分校教授)
这是一本因讲真话而难能可贵的书。书中所记载的一些历史错误、教训或灾难从反面表明,让有专长的科学家和知识分子参与公共决策是多么的重要!法治健全的社会才能容许、保障、鼓励知识分子独立,讲良心,并提出专业意见。(饶毅,北京大学教授、《知识分子》主编)
熊卫民教授通过人物访谈记录下来的是一部活的中国现代科技史。那些激动人心的岁月,那些惨痛的教训,都有无穷的教益值得后人记取。“后人哀之而不鉴之,亦使后人而复哀后人也”,中国现代科学文化建设任重而道远。(吴国盛,清华大学教授)
熊卫民长期进行当代科学家的口述采访,他善于挖掘通向体制机理的重要细节,展示了一幅令人深思的中国科学史画卷。(丁东,文史学者)
科学家的声音淡出公众视线已久矣,这本访谈录是当代中国科学家对往事的回顾,不仅具有史料价值,而且可以看到他们与时代的互动,以及他们在20世纪后半叶承担的命运。(傅国涌,文史学者)
2017年5月29日 已读
可与《中国植物志编纂史》参看,感觉科学这一块大陆的现当代史不比文艺的料少,有人的地方就有江湖啊。咱们中国吃亏就吃亏在浪费了几十年,为了某党巩固权力什么的。另外钱学森这位高伟光的科学家着实是个嘴炮,有点丢科学精神的脸。作者最后还写了一篇方法论的文章,学风很严谨。
2017 书评 共和国 历史 口述史
激荡三十年:中国企业1978~2008. 上 豆瓣
作者: 吴晓波 出版社: 中信出版社 2014 - 7
本书是《激荡三十年》修订版。尽管任何一段历史都有它不可替代的独特性,可是,1978年—2008年的中国,却是最不可能重复的。作者站在民间的角度,以真切而激扬的写作手法描绘了中国企业在改革开放年代走向市场、走向世界的成长、发展之路。改革开放初期汹涌的商品大潮;国营企业、民营企业、外资企业,这三种力量此消彼长、互相博弈的曲折发展;整个社会的躁动和不安……整部书稿中都体现得极为真切和实在。作者用激扬的文字再现出人们在历史创造中的激情、喜悦、呐喊、苦恼和悲愤。