烧脑
无双 (2018) IMDb 维基数据 豆瓣 TMDB
無雙
其它标题:
無雙
/
Project Gutenberg
…
身陷囹圄的李问(郭富城 饰)被引渡回港,他原本隶属于一个的跨国假钞制贩组织。该组织曾犯下过多宗恶性案件,而首脑“画家”不仅始终逍遥法外,连真面目都没人知道。为了逼迫李问吐露“画家”真实身份,警方不惜用足以判死刑的假罪证使其就范。就在此时,富有的遗孀阮文(张静初 饰)申请保释李问,而警方提出的条件依然是“画家”的真面目。
原来早在十数年前,李问和阮文是一对画家情侣,无奈女友的作品受人青睐,李问的画作却被贬得一文不值。就在此困顿期间,他制作假画的才能被“画家”(周润发 饰)发掘,进而成为对方美元假币团伙中的一员……
原来早在十数年前,李问和阮文是一对画家情侣,无奈女友的作品受人青睐,李问的画作却被贬得一文不值。就在此困顿期间,他制作假画的才能被“画家”(周润发 饰)发掘,进而成为对方美元假币团伙中的一员……
Our Great Qing 豆瓣
作者:
Johan Elverskog
出版社:
University of Hawaii Press
2006
- 7
"In a sweeping overview of four centuries of Mongolian history that draws on previously untapped sources, Johan Elverskog opens up totally new perspectives on some of the most urgent questions historians have recently raised about the role of Buddhism in the constitution of the Qing empire. Theoretically informed and strongly comparative in approach, Elverskog’s work tells a fascinating and important story that will interest all scholars working at the intersection of religion and politics." —Mark Elliott, Harvard University
"Johan Elverskog has rewritten the political and intellectual history of Mongolia from the bottom up, telling a convincing story that clarifies for the first time the revolutions which Mongolian concepts of community, rule, and religion underwent from 1500 to 1900. His account of Qing rule in Mongolia doesn’t just tell us what images the Qing emperors wished to project, but also what images the Mongols accepted themselves, and how these changed over the centuries. In the scope of time it covers, the originality of the views advanced, and the accuracy of the scholarship upon which it is based, Our Great Qing seems destined to mark a watershed in Mongolian studies. It will be essential reading for specialists in Mongolian studies and will make an important contribution and riposte to the ‘new Qing history’ now changing the face of late imperial Chinese history. Specialists in Tibetan Buddhism and Buddhism’s interaction with the political realm will also find in this work challenging and thought-provoking." —ChristopherAtwood, Indiana University
Although it is generally believed that the Manchus controlled the Mongols through their patronage of Tibetan Buddhism, scant attention has been paid to the Mongol view of the Qing imperial project. In contrast to other accounts of Manchu rule, Our Great Qing focuses not only on what images the metropole wished to project into Mongolia, but also on what images the Mongols acknowledged themselves. Rather than accepting the Manchu’s use of Buddhism, Johan Elverskog begins by questioning the static, unhistorical, and hegemonic view of political life implicit in the Buddhist explanation. By stressing instead the fluidity of identity and Buddhist practice as processes continually developing in relation to state formations, this work explores how Qing policies were understood by Mongols and how they came to see themselves as Qing subjects.
In his investigation of Mongol society on the eve of the Manchu conquest, Elverskog reveals the distinctive political theory of decentralization that fostered the civil war among the Mongols. He explains how it was that the Manchu Great Enterprise was not to win over "Mongolia" but was instead to create a unified Mongol community of which the disparate preexisting communities would merely be component parts.
A key element fostering this change was the Qing court’s promotion of Gelukpa orthodoxy, which not only transformed Mongol historical narratives and rituals but also displaced the earlier vernacular Mongolian Buddhism. Finally, Elverskog demonstrates how this eighteenth-century conception of a Mongol community, ruled by an aristocracy and nourished by a Buddhist emperor, gave way to a pan-Qing solidarity of all Buddhist peoples against Muslims and Christians and to local identities that united for the first time aristocrats with commoners in a new Mongol Buddhist identity on the eve of the twentieth century.
"Johan Elverskog has rewritten the political and intellectual history of Mongolia from the bottom up, telling a convincing story that clarifies for the first time the revolutions which Mongolian concepts of community, rule, and religion underwent from 1500 to 1900. His account of Qing rule in Mongolia doesn’t just tell us what images the Qing emperors wished to project, but also what images the Mongols accepted themselves, and how these changed over the centuries. In the scope of time it covers, the originality of the views advanced, and the accuracy of the scholarship upon which it is based, Our Great Qing seems destined to mark a watershed in Mongolian studies. It will be essential reading for specialists in Mongolian studies and will make an important contribution and riposte to the ‘new Qing history’ now changing the face of late imperial Chinese history. Specialists in Tibetan Buddhism and Buddhism’s interaction with the political realm will also find in this work challenging and thought-provoking." —ChristopherAtwood, Indiana University
Although it is generally believed that the Manchus controlled the Mongols through their patronage of Tibetan Buddhism, scant attention has been paid to the Mongol view of the Qing imperial project. In contrast to other accounts of Manchu rule, Our Great Qing focuses not only on what images the metropole wished to project into Mongolia, but also on what images the Mongols acknowledged themselves. Rather than accepting the Manchu’s use of Buddhism, Johan Elverskog begins by questioning the static, unhistorical, and hegemonic view of political life implicit in the Buddhist explanation. By stressing instead the fluidity of identity and Buddhist practice as processes continually developing in relation to state formations, this work explores how Qing policies were understood by Mongols and how they came to see themselves as Qing subjects.
In his investigation of Mongol society on the eve of the Manchu conquest, Elverskog reveals the distinctive political theory of decentralization that fostered the civil war among the Mongols. He explains how it was that the Manchu Great Enterprise was not to win over "Mongolia" but was instead to create a unified Mongol community of which the disparate preexisting communities would merely be component parts.
A key element fostering this change was the Qing court’s promotion of Gelukpa orthodoxy, which not only transformed Mongol historical narratives and rituals but also displaced the earlier vernacular Mongolian Buddhism. Finally, Elverskog demonstrates how this eighteenth-century conception of a Mongol community, ruled by an aristocracy and nourished by a Buddhist emperor, gave way to a pan-Qing solidarity of all Buddhist peoples against Muslims and Christians and to local identities that united for the first time aristocrats with commoners in a new Mongol Buddhist identity on the eve of the twentieth century.
看不见的客人 (2016) IMDb 维基数据 豆瓣 TMDB
Contratiempo
其它标题:
Contratiempo
/
死无对证(港)
…
艾德里安(马里奥·卡萨斯 Mario Casas 饰)经营着一间科技公司,事业蒸蒸日上,家中有美丽贤惠的妻子和活泼可爱的女儿,事业家庭双丰收的他是旁人羡慕的对象。然而,野心勃勃的艾德里安并未珍惜眼前来之不易的生活,一直以来,他和一位名叫劳拉(芭芭拉·蓝妮 Bárbara Lennie 饰)的女摄影师保持着肉体关系。
某日幽会过后,两人驱车离开别墅,却在路上发生了车祸,为了掩盖事件的真相,两人决定将在车祸中死去的青年丹尼尔联同他的车一起沉入湖底。之后,劳拉遇见了一位善良的老人,老人将劳拉坏掉的车拉回家中修理,然而,令劳拉没有想到的是,这位老人,竟然就是丹尼尔的父亲。
某日幽会过后,两人驱车离开别墅,却在路上发生了车祸,为了掩盖事件的真相,两人决定将在车祸中死去的青年丹尼尔联同他的车一起沉入湖底。之后,劳拉遇见了一位善良的老人,老人将劳拉坏掉的车拉回家中修理,然而,令劳拉没有想到的是,这位老人,竟然就是丹尼尔的父亲。
方向 豆瓣
Sens
8.5 (147 个评分)
作者:
[法] 马克-安托万·马修
译者:
后浪漫(编译)
出版社:
北京联合出版公司
2017
- 4
欧洲艺术漫画奇才马修全新烧脑神作
图像小说内容和形式上的双重突破
智力与想象力的乐趣背后,是深刻的哲学探讨
...................
※编辑推荐※
《画的秘密》作者马克-安托万·马修烧脑神作之二,是一次挑战漫画极限的艺术实验。
马修以极简的画面语言构建了一 个庞大无比的迷宫,一个无名的人在其中跟随着莫名其妙的箭头,从一维跨到多维,从微观转到宏观……
《方向》即便在马修的作品中也算得最独特的:不着一字,尽得风流。原作本无一字,标题只是一个→,出版时才加了个书名Sens——既可以指“方向”,也可以指“意义”。
《方向》没有“字”,但有自己的语言——请读者在尽情释放想象力和独立思考之余,破解作者的密码,听听作者对荒诞的看法。
...................
※内容简介※
一个无名的人在一片空茫茫的世界里跟随箭头前进、前进……他要去哪里?不知道。意义是什么?不知道。
好了,面对这样一本奇书,每一个字的介绍都是多余的。聪明的你,跟紧了→
...................
※媒体推荐※
当代西西弗在荒诞的迷宫里随着存在中的偶然不断游走。
——布鲁塞尔专题画展介绍辞
跟卡夫卡、博尔赫斯、贝克特和佩索阿的结合体最接近的一部漫画。
——法国《世界报》
一部了不起的风格尝试之作,带我们跳出时间和日常生活,摆脱物质的纠缠。
——ActuaBD
马修的聪明之处在于将深刻的底色掩盖在机巧的形式之下:大胆的表象底下藏着腼腆的人道主义。
——Esprit BD
图像小说内容和形式上的双重突破
智力与想象力的乐趣背后,是深刻的哲学探讨
...................
※编辑推荐※
《画的秘密》作者马克-安托万·马修烧脑神作之二,是一次挑战漫画极限的艺术实验。
马修以极简的画面语言构建了一 个庞大无比的迷宫,一个无名的人在其中跟随着莫名其妙的箭头,从一维跨到多维,从微观转到宏观……
《方向》即便在马修的作品中也算得最独特的:不着一字,尽得风流。原作本无一字,标题只是一个→,出版时才加了个书名Sens——既可以指“方向”,也可以指“意义”。
《方向》没有“字”,但有自己的语言——请读者在尽情释放想象力和独立思考之余,破解作者的密码,听听作者对荒诞的看法。
...................
※内容简介※
一个无名的人在一片空茫茫的世界里跟随箭头前进、前进……他要去哪里?不知道。意义是什么?不知道。
好了,面对这样一本奇书,每一个字的介绍都是多余的。聪明的你,跟紧了→
...................
※媒体推荐※
当代西西弗在荒诞的迷宫里随着存在中的偶然不断游走。
——布鲁塞尔专题画展介绍辞
跟卡夫卡、博尔赫斯、贝克特和佩索阿的结合体最接近的一部漫画。
——法国《世界报》
一部了不起的风格尝试之作,带我们跳出时间和日常生活,摆脱物质的纠缠。
——ActuaBD
马修的聪明之处在于将深刻的底色掩盖在机巧的形式之下:大胆的表象底下藏着腼腆的人道主义。
——Esprit BD