威权主义
The Contentious Public Sphere 豆瓣
作者: Ya-Wen Lei Princeton University Press 2017
Since the mid-2000s, public opinion and debate in China have become increasingly common and consequential, despite the ongoing censorship of speech and regulation of civil society. How did this happen? In The Contentious Public Sphere, Ya-Wen Lei shows how the Chinese state drew on law, the media, and the Internet to further an authoritarian project of modernization, but in so doing, inadvertently created a nationwide public sphere in China—one the state must now endeavor to control. Lei examines the influence this unruly sphere has had on Chinese politics and the ways that the state has responded.
Using interviews, newspaper articles, online texts, official documents, and national surveys, Lei shows that the development of the public sphere in China has provided an unprecedented forum for citizens to influence the public agenda, demand accountability from the government, and organize around the concepts of law and rights. She demonstrates how citizens came to understand themselves as legal subjects, how legal and media professionals began to collaborate in unexpected ways, and how existing conditions of political and economic fragmentation created unintended opportunities for political critique, particularly with the rise of the Internet. The emergence of this public sphere—and its uncertain future—is a pressing issue with important implications for the political prospects of the Chinese people.
Investigating how individuals learn to use public discourse to influence politics, The Contentious Public Sphere offers new possibilities for thinking about the transformation of state-society relations.
2020年1月8日 已读
恍如隔世。感觉写区域研究的论文,要么得对区域本身有新的洞见。要么,好点得把区域案例给贡献新的理解,差点至少得用英语学科内部能懂的语言给解释案例;我感觉本书属于最后一种,读起来有时候感觉细节很多,像一个narrative,但是没有分析,北上广三地的媒体生态差异完全被简化成了地理位置和权力中心的远近;法律行业和记者的联手仿佛仅仅是时间的作用:恰巧形成了法律行业,然后就和记者联手了(原文讲的复杂一些,就说是市场化加上国家普法需求,使得这两拨人遇到一起)。
中国研究 威权主义 社会学
Accepting Authoritarianism 豆瓣
作者: Teresa Wright Stanford University Press 2010 - 3
Why hasn't the emergence of capitalism led China's citizenry to press for liberal democratic change? This book argues that China's combination of state-led development, late industrialization, and socialist legacies have affected popular perceptions of socioeconomic mobility, economic dependence on the state, and political options, giving citizens incentives to perpetuate the political status quo and disincentives to embrace liberal democratic change.
Wright addresses the ways in which China's political and economic development shares broader features of state-led late industrialization and post-socialist transformation with countries as diverse as Mexico, India, Tunisia, Indonesia, South Korea, Brazil, Russia, and Vietnam.
With its detailed analysis of China's major socioeconomic groups (private entrepreneurs, state sector workers, private sector workers, professionals and students, and farmers), Accepting Authoritarianism is an up-to-date, comprehensive, and coherent text on the evolution of state-society relations in reform-era China.