Today, Chinese characters are described as a national treasure, the core of the nation’s civilizational identity. Yet for nearly half of the twentieth century, reformers waged war on the Chinese script. They declared it an archaic hindrance to modernization, portraying the ancient system of writing as a roadblock to literacy and therefore science and democracy. Movements spanning the political spectrum proposed abandonment of characters and alphabetization of Chinese writing, although in the end the Communist Party opted for character simplification.
Chinese Grammatology traces the origins, transmutations, and containment of this script revolution to provide a groundbreaking account of its formative effects on Chinese literature and culture, and lasting implications for the encounter between the alphabetic and nonalphabet worlds. Yurou Zhong explores the growth of competing Romanization and Latinization movements aligned with the clashing Nationalists and Communists. She finds surprising affinities between alphabetic reform and modern Chinese literary movements and examines the politics of literacy programs and mass education against the backdrop of war and revolution. Zhong places the Chinese script revolution in the global context of a phonocentric dominance that privileges phonetic writing, contending that the eventual retention of characters constituted an anti-ethnocentric, anti-imperial critique that coincided with postwar decolonization movements and predated the emergence of Deconstructionism. By revealing the consequences of one of the biggest linguistic experiments in history, Chinese Grammatology provides an ambitious rethinking of the origins of Chinese literary modernity and the politics of the science of writing.

Taking aim at the conventional narrative that standard, national languages transform "peasants" into citizens, Gina Anne Tam centers the history of the Chinese nation and national identity on fangyan - languages like Shanghainese, Cantonese, and dozens of others that are categorically different from the Chinese national language, Mandarin. She traces how, on the one hand, linguists, policy-makers, bureaucrats and workaday educators framed fangyan as non-standard "variants" of the Chinese language, subsidiary in symbolic importance to standard Mandarin. She simultaneously highlights, on the other hand, the folksong collectors, playwrights, hip-hop artists and popular protestors who argued that fangyan were more authentic and representative of China's national culture and its history. From the late Qing through the height of the Maoist period, these intertwined visions of the Chinese nation - one spoken in one voice, one spoken in many - interacted and shaped one another, and in the process, shaped the basis for national identity itself.

本书分三个部分：“第一部分 普通语言学基本理论和概念”、“第二部分 语音研究”、“第三部分 语法研究”。

有两种基本的框架可供选择，一是以哲学家为线索，一是以问题为线索。两种框架各有利弊，《语言哲学》做了混合式的安排：前面的四章谈论语言哲学的背景、简要介绍语言哲学的一些基本论题，中间从索绪尔到乔姆斯基共九章依次阐论20世纪一些最重要的语言哲学家。此后，第十四章先扼要介绍以往哲学家对专名问题的看法，进而探讨指称／意义这一语言哲学的基本问题，第十五章先扼要介绍语言哲学发展后期几位哲学家对隐喻的看法，进而探讨字面／隐含这个基本问题。第十六章从整体上探讨语言和现实的关系，概述了陈嘉映老师对语言哲学的一些主要问题的看法。

《在语词的密林里》收录的201条随感就是很好的例子。前100条完成于1991年。陈老此前在《读书》杂志开设专栏，每期写几则札记体的闲文，谈论古往今来、时下流行的语词现象，以及汉语词汇演变研究中的点滴体会，竞成了许多读者阅览该杂志时的首选。若干年后，作者“重返语词的密林”，话锋不减当年，所谈多是发自生活的流行语汇，至2002年，又完成了收入《在语词的密林里》的后101条。
作者在语林中拾遗补缺，为文字语汇做出中肯的解释，从语义学角度探讨文字的变迁，不仅夹有例句说明，还配有百余幅古朴的小图，包括殷周秦汉的甲骨金文、碑刻石刻，玛雅和阿兹特克古文书，古希腊、古埃及图案，文艺复兴前后的书籍插图等，图文顾盼生姿，读来亲切活泼。
《在语词的密林里》这本无心插柳的小书，1991年初版时是“读书文丛”的一种，1998、2005年先后出有“三联精选”、“中国文库”版，此次出版已是第四版了。