jack_12591 - Posts
3w jack_12591

看过 挽救计划 🌕🌕🌕🌗🌑
这段卡拉OK [1] 是点睛之笔

> There’s a fleeting yet sublime moment of connection one night, when Stratt, lowering her guard at a bar with her colleagues, croons a gorgeous cover of Harry Styles’s “Sign of the Times.” You have to wonder if the filmmakers were inspired by the actor’s great performance in “Toni Erdmann” (2016), in which she similarly turned a karaoke moment into the stuff of emotional revelation. “We gotta get away from here,” Hüller sings, and rightly so. She’s out of this world. [2]

几年前看过一点原著小说，还没看到Grace遇到rocky就放弃了。据说电影改编过程中丢失了原著的科学性，这让我想接着看看原著，但是现在看完电影已经被剧透了😢。

> The big-screen version caters to America’s dumbification, which devalues expertise and scientific evidence. The film doesn’t trust its audience to follow passages of scientific inquiry and reasoning. And so, star Ryan Gosling spends much of the movie in charmer mode rather than science-guy mode, while the directors rely on his charisma and the production’s reportedly $200 million price tag to deliver an oversimplified save-the-world scenario. Project Hail Mary may be good enough to keep moviegoers diverted for two-and-a-half hours, but it’s a bad adaptation of Weir’s book. [3]

---
[1] www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2m50b
[2] www.newyorker.com/magazine/202
[3] www.deepfocusreview.com/review

3w jack_12591

读过 稀缺 🌕🌕🌕🌑🌑
从 Zvi 的 slack [1] 文章里面得知这本书的。看完了，我的感受是看个观点总结就够了，没必要看书。相同观点翻来覆去的说，显得十分冗长。虽然举了很多例子，但是对其的讨论不够深入，并不能增强其观点的可信度。我认同 Zvi 对本书的评论

> The book makes some very good points that everyone should know, and makes them well, but like many such books makes them over and over again where a more concise slash less repetitive version would do nicely. It’s less bad at this than average, but still not great. Almost all popular books of this type do it, so presumably there isn’t much of an alternative.[2]

[1] thezvi.wordpress.com/2017/09/3
[2] thezvi.wordpress.com/2015/05/0

3w jack_12591

读过 深度工作 🌕🌕🌕🌕🌑