社会主义
Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism 豆瓣
作者: Kristen Ghodsee Bodley Head 2018 - 11
A spirited, deeply researched exploration of why capitalism is bad for women and how, when done right, socialism leads to economic independence, better labor conditions, better work-life balance and, yes, even better sex.
In a witty, irreverent op-ed piece that went viral, Kristen Ghodsee argued that women had better sex under socialism. The response was tremendous -- clearly she articulated something many women had sensed for years: the problem is with capitalism, not with us.
Ghodsee, an acclaimed ethnographer and professor of Russian and East European Studies, spent years researching what happened to women in countries that transitioned from state socialism to capitalism. She argues here that unregulated capitalism disproportionately harms women, and that we should learn from the past. By rejecting the bad and salvaging the good, we can adapt some socialist ideas to the 21st century and improve our lives.
She tackles all aspects of a woman's life - work, parenting, sex and relationships, citizenship, and leadership. In a chapter called "Women: Like Men, But Cheaper," she talks about women in the workplace, discussing everything from the wage gap to harassment and discrimination. In "What To Expect When You're Expecting Exploitation," she addresses motherhood and how "having it all" is impossible under capitalism.
Women are standing up for themselves like never before, from the increase in the number of women running for office to the women's march to the long-overdue public outcry against sexual harassment. Interest in socialism is also on the rise - whether it's the popularity of Bernie Sanders or the skyrocketing membership numbers of the Democratic Socialists of America. It's become increasingly clear to women that capitalism isn't working for us, and Ghodsee is the informed, lively guide who can show us the way forward.
2021年12月9日 想读 2333听了 Blinkist 应该不能算读过。Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism?因为在资本主义和传统社会里女性不得不承担起更多的无偿生育劳动,这会进一步剥夺女性的经济独立,损害女性的职业发展前途,而新自由主义将一切都归结为市场竞争下的个人选择,无视结构性之恶造成的影响。生育——作为性的后果——代价如此沉重,女性当然无法享受(异性恋)性爱。但如果是丁克家庭呢?如果是les 呢?第三波浪潮也有观点认为,资本主义只在乎劳动力的质量,并不在乎付出劳动者的性别,而这有利于女性脱离父权制家庭的控制(Iris Young说的?记不清了)。还有挺多问题可讨论的,有空再读。
Feminism NonFiction 女性 性别研究 社会主义