Daniel Leese — 作者 (5)
崇拜毛:文化大革命中的言辭崇拜與儀式崇拜 [图书] Goodreads
7.9 (7 个评分) 作者: Daniel Leese / 丹尼爾‧里斯 出版社: 香港中文大學 2017 - 8
儘管很多著作都談論過毛澤東在權力如日中天時黨內外對他的崇拜,卻還沒有一本專著系統地探討這種「崇拜毛」的現象及其本質。本書即是該領域研究的開山之作。
作者收集了大量機密檔案文獻、大小物證、政治傳單等,在扎實史實基礎之上,指出對毛的崇拜不同於以往的皇帝崇拜,而是現代特有的統治工具,並層層分析了其背後邏輯和理性操作。研究集中於探討對毛的言辭崇拜與儀式崇拜,不僅引人入勝地重現了狂熱荒誕的歷史現場和細節,更敏銳地發掘出在瘋狂異化的表象背後,這種崇拜所具有的工具性、現代性與政治性。
本書為理解文革乃至中國的未來,提供了獨到且富有洞見的角度,因為書中所討論的崇拜現象及邏輯,在今日中國仍然沒有走遠。
名人推薦
這本關於毛澤東崇拜的研究著作,深刻犀利地分析了當代中國領袖崇拜的政治和概念起源。除官方媒體資料和中央指令之外,作者還使用了地方檔案以及從舊貨市場收集到的原始文獻,並以此為基礎將地方政府還原為更具體的基層幹部、解放軍軍官、互相競爭的中共領導人等,他們在製造毛崇拜的過程中都發揮了關鍵作用。文革中紅寶書的出版,讓億萬中國人得以直接學習毛語錄,破除了由黨壟斷的解釋權,並造成了持續的後果。本書對毛澤東崇拜的言辭與儀式的研究極具價值、引人入勝,並且告訴我們,對中國這段重要歷史時期的研究仍然大有可為。—周錫瑞(Joseph W. Esherick,美國加州大學聖地亞哥分校榮譽教授)
里斯的大著基於難得的史料,為我們闡述了對毛澤東的個人崇拜在中國的盛衰,其中大量檔案材料是從未引用過的。對「崇拜毛」這一複雜的社會現象,里斯作了精闢的分析,並提出了具有說服力的見解 。至於這是一個特殊時代的特殊現象還是一個可稱之為周而復始的形態,諒讀者們自有評說。—沈邁克(Michael Schoenhals,瑞典隆德大學教授)
本書是全世界第一部探討崇拜毛澤東的問題和現象的專著。書中較細緻地追述了這種崇拜的由來和演變,並深入概括了其在「文化大革命」時期的體現和氾濫,十分具體地展現了對毛澤東的崇拜在語言、媒介、儀式和用品等等層面上的諸多特點,進而頗為有力地從現當代世界中許多領袖崇拜文化的視角分析和把握了這種崇拜的影響、意義和取向。本書充分顯示了作者對於中國現代歷史研究的學術功力和學理水平。—唐少傑(清華大學教授)
Mao Cult [图书] 豆瓣
作者: Daniel Leese 出版社: Cambridge University Press 2011 - 8
Mao Zedong's political and cultural legacy remains potent even in today's China. There have been many books that have explored his posthumous legacy, but none that has scrutinized the cult of Mao and the massive worship that was fostered around him at the height of his powers during the Cultural Revolution. This riveting book is the first to do so. By analyzing previously secret archival documents, obscure objects, and political pamphlets, Daniel Leese traces the tumultuous history of the cult within the Communist Party and at the grassroots level. The Party leadership's original intention was to develop a prominent brand symbol, which would compete with the nationalists' elevation of Chiang Kai-shek. They did not, however, anticipate that Mao would use this symbolic power to mobilize Chinese youth to rebel against party bureaucracy itself. The result was anarchy, and when the army was called in, it relied on mandatory rituals of worship, such as daily reading of the Little Red Book or performances of 'the loyalty dance', to restore order. Such fascinating detail sheds light not only on the personality cult of Mao, but also on hero-worship in other traditions.
Justice After Mao [图书] 谷歌图书 博客來
作者: Daniel Leese / Amanda Shuman 出版社: Cambridge University Press 2023 - 09
How can a dictatorship cope with the legacy of injustices and atrocities committed in its own name? This was one of the pressing questions the Chinese Communist Party leadership faced after the death of Mao Zedong in September 1976 and the end of the Cultural Revolution. This collection presents ground-breaking, original research to address the question of historical justice in the Party's attempt to survive politically despite rampant factionalism and widespread political persecution. The volume traces complex questions of property restitution, fostering reconciliation within local communities, and establishing new standards of truth. Contributions also investigate how various actors remember the period in the present. The post-Mao period provides a lens through which to view strategies of coping with a violent past under state socialism, highlighting how selectively applied approaches now associated with the concept of transitional justice may even serve to strengthen rather than subvert authoritarian rule.
Victims, Perpetrators, and the Role of Law in Maoist China [图书] 谷歌图书
作者: Daniel Leese / Puck Engman 出版社: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG 2018 - 06
Eine erstmalige Analyse maoistischer Justiz auf Basis von Originalfallakten, die aufgrund ihrer plastischen Details einen tiefen Einblick in die chinesische Rechts-, Politik- und Sozialgeschichte geben. Durch die Betonung der Akteuersebene wird, jenseits von Metadiskursen, der totalitäre Charakter der frühen Volksrepublik China und der mehr oder minder großer Spielraum von Angeklagten, Richtern und politischer Führung ausgelotet. Der Band versammelt chinesische, europäische und amerikanische Wissenschaftler, um gemeinsam eine Revision des bisherigen Forschungsstandes zu ermöglichen.