敦煌写本解梦书是晚唐五代敦煌地区的卜师文士为占梦的需要，而对各种传入敦煌的地区的解梦书进行改编修订并吸收敦煌当地民俗民风而成的一种新的解梦书。本书所收集的解梦书主要是分别从英、法、俄等国藏敦煌文献中搜集辑录出来的。唐宋时期解梦书甚多，而能流传至今者却没有，故敦煌写本梦书尤其显得珍贵。
只要了解古代的占梦方法，看似高深莫测的梦书就不再那么神秘了，去掉其神秘外衣，剩下的只有对古代的风俗文化、传统观念的真实反映。

Christopher Celenza is one of the foremost contemporary scholars of the Renaissance. His ambitious new book focuses on the body of knowledge which we now call the humanities, charting its roots in the Italian Renaissance and exploring its development up to the Enlightenment. Beginning in the fifteenth century, the author shows how thinkers like Lorenzo Valla and Angelo Poliziano developed innovative ways to read texts closely, paying attention to historical context, developing methods to determine a text's authenticity, and taking the humanities seriously as a means of bettering human life. Alongside such novel reading practices, technology – the invention of printing with moveable type – fundamentally changed perceptions of truth. Celenza also reveals how luminaries like Descartes, Diderot, and D'Alembert – as well as many lesser-known scholars – challenged traditional ways of thinking. Celenza's authoritative narrative demonstrates above all how the work of the early modern humanist philosophers had a profound impact on the general quest for human wisdom. His magisterial volume will be essential reading for all those who value the humanities and their fascinating history.

The Philippine Revolution of 1896–1905, which began against Spain and continued against the United States, took place in the context of imperial subjugation and local resistance across Southeast Asia. Yet scholarship on the revolution and the turn of the twentieth century in Asia more broadly has largely approached this pivotal moment in terms of relations with the West, at the expense of understanding the East-East and Global South connections that knit together the region’s experience. Asian Place, Filipino Nation reconnects the Philippine Revolution to the histories of Southeast and East Asia through an innovative consideration of its transnational political setting and regional intellectual foundations.
Nicole CuUnjieng Aboitiz charts turn-of-the-twentieth-century Filipino thinkers’ and revolutionaries’ Asianist political organizing and proto-national thought, scrutinizing how their constructions of the place of Asia connected them to their regional neighbors. She details their material and affective engagement with Pan-Asianism, tracing how colonized peoples in the “periphery” of this imagined Asia—focusing on Filipinos, but with comparison to the Vietnamese—reformulated a political and intellectual project that envisioned anticolonial Asian solidarity with the Asian “center” of Japan. CuUnjieng Aboitiz argues that the revolutionary First Philippine Republic’s harnessing of transnational networks of support, activism, and association represents the crucial first instance of Pan-Asianists lending material aid toward anticolonial revolution against a Western power. Uncovering the Pan-Asianism of the periphery and its critical role in shaping modern Asia, Asian Place, Filipino Nation offers a vital new perspective on the Philippine Revolution’s global context and content.

没有一个人能够把西方哲学史的故事讲得如此生动有趣。安东尼·戈特利布做到了。他认为在西方哲学迄今2500年历史中，有两个极其活跃的爆发期，每个时期有150年左右。第一个时期在苏格拉底、柏拉图和亚里士多德的雅典，从公元前5世纪中期到公元前4世纪末，作者就此写成了《理性之梦：从古希腊到文艺复兴的哲学史》；第二个时期在北欧，在欧洲宗教战争爆发和伽利略科学兴起之时，这个时期从17世纪30年代延伸到18世纪后半期的法国大革命前夜，笛卡尔、霍布斯、斯宾诺莎、洛克、莱布尼兹、休谟、卢梭和伏尔泰——即大多数最著名的现代哲学家——留下了他们的标记。《启蒙之梦：现代哲学的兴起》讲了这些人的故事。他们探究新科学和宗教剧变的含义，对古希腊以来的哲学提出质疑。科学的进步对我们对于自身的认识、对我们的上帝观有何影响？政府应当怎样对待宗教的多样性？究竟为什么建立政府？ 这些哲学家仍然在对我们说话，但这易使我们误解他们。为避免我们用现代人的观点语言去理解他们，作者希望我们重新穿上这些哲人的鞋子，追溯他们的时代，理解他们的怀疑和重建。而这种回溯，不仅带给我们生动丰富的故事，也让我们深思：当科技正在改变人类的生存方式并改变人类自身，甚至创造机器人类之时，在文化冲突再次加剧之时，哲学又带我们怎样去认识这个世界？

《简帛数术文献探论(增订版)》从文献学和数术史的角度来解读和认识早期数术文献，一方面注意搜求后世相关记载与出土文献对读，另一方面也注意运用出土资料重新考察某些传世文献，考证疑难数术问题。对以往未被充分重视的出土数术文献，颇多作者首次发布的研究心得。

分为:重玄学源、隋唐重玄学述评、道体论与重玄解脱、道性论和心性论、体道修性向修仙的复归等7章。

社会進化論と優生思想、民族主義と人種主義、身体の国民化とジェンダー...。近代世界が非対称的ながら等しく直面したこれらの問題群を、中国はどう経験し、自らの近代を彫琢していったのか。梁啓超、譚祠同、章炳麟らの思想家、女性教育家、科学者、「纒足」廃止論者などのテキストを、広い視野のもとに縦横に読み解き、中国の近代を描き出す。

面臨國家危急存亡之秋，十七世紀的韓國人，
是反對儒家道統，還是深化原有思想體系？
從東亞脈絡考察，挑戰近百年來的誤解與扭曲
重新定位朝鮮儒學，為韓國思想史提出新解釋
十七世紀的朝鮮受到中國、日本數度入侵，面臨建國以來最大的危機。長期以來，學者們認為，韓國思想史在此關鍵時刻出現了轉變：有些朝鮮儒者開始對正統的朱熹學說抱持懷疑、甚至提出批判，連帶產生出朱子學派與反朱子學派的對立。
《被誤讀的儒學史》透過深入考察史料，挑戰了上述論點。姜智恩指出，過往的研究受到近代東亞政治情勢遽變影響，產生了歷史圖像的扭曲：二十世紀初的韓國學者，在與日本帝國主義史觀對抗過程中，急於尋找挑戰權威的歷史人物，結果反而誤讀了朝鮮儒學史。
姜智恩認為，十七世紀朝鮮儒者所關心的，仍是如何繼承以朱子學為中心的道統。他們以高度精密的方法研究朱子學，並找出朱熹著作中的變化及矛盾，進而在此過程中衍發了新的見解，這才是十七世紀朝鮮儒學史的真相。

In this ambitious work of political and intellectual history, Charles Hartman surveys the major sources that survive as vestiges of the official dynastic historiography of the Chinese Song dynasty (960–1279). Analyzing the narratives that emerge from these sources as products of Song political discourse, Hartman offers a thorough introduction to the texts and the political circumstances surrounding their compilation. Distilling from these sources a 'grand allegory of Song history', he argues that the narratives embedded within reflect tension between a Confucian model of political institutionalism and the Song court's preference for a non-sectarian, technocratic model. Fundamentally rethinking the corpus of texts that have formed the basis of our understanding of the Song and of imperial China more broadly, this far-reaching account of historiographical process and knowledge production illuminates the relationship between official history writing and political struggle in China.

春秋之前，学在王官，有其事必有其官，有其官则必有其学。在上古时代，不同的知识观念派生出相应的职事需求，不同的职事需求推导出相应的社会功能，不同的社会功能催生出相应的话语方式，而最后不同的话语方式表现为相应的文献形态。在先秦头绪纷繁的知识系统中，渊源最古的便是天学知识。这项知识可以追溯到殷商或者更早的四方祭祀活动，其本身就具备知识与观念的双重属性。萌芽于先商，发展于战国的天学，始终体现着知识与观念的交缠。在中国上古史这段重要的制度创造时期里，天学知识以其深刻的观念性和广阔的阐释空间，很快成为政治制度的思想资源。在商周代际，巫觋被吸收进了史职体系，并利用天学知识中的“授时”传统，对政治作出“时”或“不时”的价值判断，建立起独具特色的史官话语；另一方面，他们对自然秩序的背后推动者，亦即“天”的阐释，构成了殷周革命的合法性来源。到了战国末期，诸子基于各自的学派立场，在天学作为政治哲学及科学的本体论和技术层面分别进行了重构或扩展，其中，稷下学者与阴阳家是其中最明显地继承了上古天学知识观念的群体。他们创立了最具野心的“五德终始”宇宙图式和“月令”话语系统，打破了王权“立中”的绝对性，再次印证了天学话语及其传承者在上古权力话语的建构中扮演着重要角色。
本书立足于对知识观念、功能制度、文体形态的综合考察，试图以上古天学知识和观念为中心，以时间为轴，纵向梳理出从殷商到战国，知识的发展与功能的变迁，是如何影响着文献的写定与人们的言说。

In volume 2 of this monumental work, Mircea Eliade continues his magisterial progress through the history of religious ideas. The religions of ancient China, Brahmanism and Hinduism, Buddha and his contemporaries, Roman religion, Celtic and German religions, Judaism, the Hellenistic period, the Iranian syntheses, and the birth of Christianity—all are encompassed in this volume.

This volume completes the immensely learned three-volume A History of Religious Ideas. Eliade examines the movement of Jewish thought out of ancient Eurasia, the Christian transformation of the Mediterranean area and Europe, and the rise and diffusion of Islam from approximately the sixth through the seventeenth centuries. Eliade's vast knowledge of past and present scholarship provides a synthesis that is unparalleled. In addition to reviewing recent interpretations of the individual traditions, he explores the interactions of the three religions and shows their continuing mutual influence to be subtle but unmistakable.

"No one has done so much as Mr. Eliade to inform literature students in the West about 'primitive' and Oriental religions. . . . Everyo ne who cares about the human adventure will find new information and new angles of vision."--Martin E. Marty, New York Times Book Review
‘A History of Religious Ideas, volume 1 will arouse the interest of all historians of western religion, since it includes chapters on the religions of Canaan and Israel. However, the book must be read cover to cover if one wants to grasp the significance of its gigantic historical scope...Not only has the work unity through Eliade's authorship, but it lays the foundation of the history of religious' edifice of which he has been one of the principal architects.' --Kees W. Bolle, Church History.

Philology-the discipline of making sense of texts-is enjoying a renaissance within academia after decades of neglect. World Philology charts the evolution of philology across the many cultures and historical time periods in which it has been practiced, and demonstrates how this branch of knowledge, like philosophy and mathematics, is an essential component of human understanding.
Every civilization has developed ways of interpreting the texts that it produces, and differences of philological practice are as instructive as the similarities. We owe our idea of a textual edition for example, to the third-century BCE scholars of the Alexandrian Library. Rabbinical philology created an innovation in hermeneutics by shifting focus from how the Bible commands to what it commands. Philologists in Song China and Tokugawa Japan produced startling insights into the nature of linguistic signs. In the early modern period, new kinds of philology arose in Europe but also among Indian, Chinese, and Japanese commentators, Persian editors, and Ottoman educationalists who began to interpret texts in ways that had little historical precedent. They made judgments about the integrity and consistency of texts, decided how to create critical editions, and determined what it actually means to read.
Covering a wide range of cultures-Greek, Roman, Hebrew, Arabic, Sanskrit, Chinese, Indo-Persian, Japanese, Ottoman, and modern European-World Philology lays the groundwork for a new scholarly discipline.