In the 1990's, the focus of phonological studies has changed from rule-based analysis to constraint-based analysis. The study of Chinese phonology has also undergone such a change, as have other area studies in Generative Phonology. Why and how this change has occurred, the difference between the two kinds of analyses, and what has really happened in phonology after the change are the primary concerns of linguists and anyone interested in the study of Generative Phonology or other area studies in Generative Linguistics. To answer these questions, one must: review the developing process of the change; compare the two kinds of analyses in terms of their different frameworks and research focuses; and profile the studies in phonology (in any area studies) in recent years. "Chinese Phonology in Generative Grammar" is intended to offer such a review and comparison while outlining the studies in Chinese phonology. Eight unpublished papers written by seven authors are selected to cover the areas of field-work, dialectology, and synchronic studies of segmental and tonal systems of the Chinese language family. These papers are directly related to the theoretical issues in: the SPE Model; Lexical Phonology and Morphology; Autosegmental Phonology; Metrical Phonology; and Optimality Theory. By putting the study of Chinese phonology into the generative perspective, this collection provides useful data for further theoretical work and draw significant feedback to the theory of Generative Phonology. It reviews the theoretical development from rule-based analysis to constraint-based analysis in the study of Generative Phonology over the last three decades. It compares the two kinds of analyses with respect to their different frameworks and research focuses and their relations with each other in Generative Phonology. It profiles the study of Chinese phonology in recent years by putting it into the generative perspective.

外三种包括：汪广洋撰《凤池吟稿》十卷（浙江汪汝瑮家藏本）、陶安撰《陶学士集》二十卷（浙江汪汝瑮家藏本）、宋讷撰《西隐集》·十卷（浙江汪汝瑮家藏本）。

This ground breaking study dispels the common belief that Chinese 'doesn't have words' but instead 'has characters'. Jerome Packard's book provides a comprehensive discussion of the linguistic and cognitive nature of Chinese words. It shows that Chinese, far from being 'morphologically impoverished', has a different morphological system because it selects different 'settings' on parameters shared by all languages. The analysis of Chinese word formation therefore enhances our understanding of word universals. Packard describes the intimate relationship between words and their components, including how the identities of Chinese morphemes are word-driven, and offers new insights into the evolution of morphemes based on Chinese data. Models are offered for how Chinese words are stored in the mental lexicon and processed in natural speech, showing that much of what native speakers know about words occurs innately in the form of a hard-wired, specifically linguistic 'program' in the brain.

本书主要用形式语义学的焦点理论，来分析句子成分之间的结构关系和语义关系；着重用数理逻辑上关于算子和变量的约束关系这种观念，来分析焦点敏感算子跟焦点之间的语义关联、及其结构限制，概括汉语焦点结构的形式特征和语义特点，构建焦点结构的句法分析程序和相应的语义解释程序，揭示汉语焦点结构对句子的语义解释产生作用的具体机制，以更有效地分析和表示汉语句子的语义结构跟形式结构之间的映射关系，推进汉语语法研究更上一个台阶。

《汉语句法学》不仅选用了现存的或可能的论述，而且运用自己的分析，对汉语的大多数结构进行解析；这些结构在过去二十五年的理论语言学中起着重要作用。《汉语句法学》涉及各种论题，包括语类、论元结构、被动句，以及照应语等。

《汉语语法分析问题》的宗旨是摆问题。问题摆出来了，有时候只提几种看法加以比较；有时候提出自己的意见，也只是聊备一说，以供参考。这些意见比较零散，不足以构成什么关系。其中也很少能说是作者的创见。有的是很多人说过的，不用交代出处；有的只记得有人说过，出在哪本书或者哪篇文章已经查不出来，只好在这里总的声明一句：没有掠美的意思。《汉语语法分析问题》原来是作为一篇论文来写的。虽然现在的篇幅已经不能容纳在期刊里而只能印成小册子。语法研究的顺利前进主要有两方面的配合：一方面要广泛地调查实际用例，一方面也要不断地把问题拿出来理一理，看看这个问题是不是有可能或者有必要从一个新的角度或者更深入一层去考察，看看一个问题的探讨是不是牵动另一个问题。

共五卷。目前最全面的严复文集。

我们生活在一个全球化的时代。因特网的使用，电子商务的蓬勃发展，交通工具的现代化，使世界变成一个整体。作为WTO成员国之一的中国，其经济已融入世界经济的一体化之中。随着“十一五”全面建设小康社会工程的启动，我国需要一大批通晓外语、外贸、对象国法律的复合型人才。与世界融合的前提是语言的沟通，因为无论是招商引资，还是在海外开拓市场从事对外文化交流，人与人、国与国之间的相互了解是最关键的。
《最新德语英语对比语法》一书由24章和4个附录组成，从德语和英语的字母、拼法、构词法、词法以及句法方面比较两种语言的异同。该书在进行比较的同时，尽量避免做艰深、烦琐的描述。全书例句大多是德语和英语对照的，且来自国内外课本、语法书、工具书以及万维网上的新闻。是学习外语极佳的工具书。