As Adam M. McKeown demonstrates, the push for increased border control and identity documentation is the continuation of more than 150 years of globalization. Not only are modern passports and national borders inseparable from the rise of global mobility, but they are also tied to the emergence of individuals and nations as the primary sites of global power and identity. McKeown's detailed history traces how, rather than being a legacy of "traditional" forms of sovereignty, practices of border control historically rose from attempts to control Asian migration around the Pacific in the 1880s. New policies to control mobility had to be justified in the context of contemporary liberal ideas of freedom and mobility, generating principles that are taken for granted today, such as the belief that migration control is a sovereign right of receiving nations and that it should occur at a country's borders. McKeown shows how the enforcement of these border controls required migrants to be extracted from social networks of identity and reconstructed as isolated individuals within centralized filing systems.
Methods for excluding Asians from full participation in the "family of civilized nations" are now the norm between all nations. These practices also helped institutionalize global cultural and economic divisions, such as East/West and First and Third World designations, which continue to shape our understanding.

在过去十多年中，资本主义全球化伴随着对文明身份的重新强调，再一次把经久不衰的文明和历史议题凸显出来。《世界秩序与文明等级》一书寻根溯源，对这些议题做了研究。它揭示出，欧美国家宰治的世界秩序在过去五百年之间是怎样形成的，“西方”文明又如何将其治组织和知识形态上升为普世的标 准。这些标准所设置的时空等级将非洲以及大洋洲（还有其他土著人）等无国家的社会置于“化外”，将亚洲社会定义为“半文明”，而欧洲和北美的资本主义社会则处于文明的最高端。正如本书的主编在序言中所指出，这一套文明标准到了20 世纪演变为世界各地人群的自我认识。而今欧美国家的霸权开始遭遇挑战，其文明霸权的地位也重新受到质疑，随之而来的则是人们对未来世界秩序的呼唤。
书中论文涉及的领域极其广泛，包括地理大发现、殖民时代的国际法体系、万国博览会等，十分具象地绘出了欧洲现代性在19至20世纪殖民扩张盛期的等级景观，其中有些论文梳理了文明理念的译介过程及其特点。无论是对当代世界秩序的历史感兴趣的读者，还是关注当今全球文化治的读者，这部文集所提供的详细研究和批判性的思考都不无裨益。