重庆一间工艺品厂已经濒临倒闭，却不料在拆倒旧厂房的时候，发现了厕所里的一件宝物——一块价值连城的翡翠。厂里决定用这块翡翠举办一个展览，赚些钱发拖欠了几个月的工人工资。期间由工艺品厂保卫科长包世宏（郭涛 饰）负责看守这件宝物。但是，国际大盗麦克与本地一帮小偷却让包世宏一筹莫展，他们各施绝技接近翡翠，展览馆开始了一场明争暗斗的较量。黑色幽默也开始幕幕上演。翡翠的价值几何？最后谁是胜出者？事情远没有表面那么简单……

失去了心爱的女人，杰森·伯恩（马特·戴蒙 饰）面临更为艰难的日子，他努力回忆，却只能在睡梦中被脑海里一知半解的闪回所惊醒，依然无法记起自己的身份。
但是伯恩注定不是平凡人，不等他冷静下来好好“找回”自己真正的身份，中情局派出的杀手又接踵而至。在接连的几次较量之后，伯恩终于被彻底激怒，决定反戈一击——他主动追击杀手，到过莫斯科、马德里。巴黎，也在伦敦和丹吉尔做过停留。
随着问题一个一个解决，杰森回到了纽约，在那里，他将会找到一切的答案，寻回自己的身份。

Economics is not widely considered to be one of the sexier sciences. The annual Nobel Prize winner in that field never receives as much publicity as his or her compatriots in peace, literature, or physics. But if such slights are based on the notion that economics is dull, or that economists are concerned only with finance itself, Steven D. Levitt will change some minds. In Freakonomics (written with Stephen J. Dubner), Levitt argues that many apparent mysteries of everyday life don't need to be so mysterious: they could be illuminated and made even more fascinating by asking the right questions and drawing connections. For example, Levitt traces the drop in violent crime rates to a drop in violent criminals and, digging further, to the Roe v. Wade decision that preempted the existence of some people who would be born to poverty and hardship. Elsewhere, by analyzing data gathered from inner-city Chicago drug-dealing gangs, Levitt outlines a corporate structure much like McDonald's, where the top bosses make great money while scores of underlings make something below minimum wage. And in a section that may alarm or relieve worried parents, Levitt argues that parenting methods don't really matter much and that a backyard swimming pool is much more dangerous than a gun. These enlightening chapters are separated by effusive passages from Dubner's 2003 profile of Levitt in The New York Times Magazine, which led to the book being written. In a book filled with bold logic, such back-patting veers Freakonomics, however briefly, away from what Levitt actually has to say. Although maybe there's a good economic reason for that too, and we're just not getting it yet. --John Moe