《纯粹现象学通论》，本书简介: 《纯粹现象学通论》(作者胡塞尔)是“汉译世界学术名著丛书”之一，书中分为事实和本质；自然主义的错误解释；自然主义的错误解释；自然态度的设定及其排除；现象学还原；纯粹意识的一般结构；关于理性理论问题系列的一般性层级等数章内容。

Covering the entire 20th century, this text traces the roots of conceptual art to movements such as Dada, explaining its importance in the 1960s and 1970s and showing that it is still alive today. In 1917 Marcel Duchamp signed the name R. Mutt on a urinal and placed it in a gallery. Even the most strident modernists refused to accept this object as a work of art, however, Duchamp stuck to his guns, claiming that he had chosen the urinal as an art object so it must be art. Such arguments over the nature of art still continue today. Tony Godfrey sees the archetypal work of Conceptual Art as a question and a proposition joined together: "What is Art? This could be Art." This text seeks to demystify the subject by placing the art in its social and political context.

Originally published in 1964, One-Dimensional Man quickly became one of the most important texts in the ensuing decade of radical political change. This second edition, newly introduced by Marcuse scholar Douglas Kellner, presents Marcuse's best-selling work to another generation of readers in the context of contemporary events.

本书是1970年联合国教科文组织出版的一部题为《人类和社会科学研究的主要趋势》的广泛研究报告的一部分，全书贯穿了认识论的思考，一方面力求标志出各种人文科学所共有的那种特殊认识的特征；另一方面作者试图以其“发生结构主义”的观点，去理解这些人文科学。

What does it mean to be truthful? What role does truth play in our lives? What do we lose if we reject truthfulness? No philosopher is better suited to answer these questions than Bernard Williams. Writing with his characteristic combination of passion and elegant simplicity, he explores the value of truth and finds it to be both less and more than we might imagine. Modern culture exhibits two attitudes toward truth: suspicion of being deceived (no one wants to be fooled) and skepticism that objective truth exists at all (no one wants to be naive). This tension between a demand for truthfulness and the doubt that there is any truth to be found is not an abstract paradox. It has political consequences and signals a danger that our intellectual activities, particularly in the humanities, may tear themselves to pieces. Williams's approach, in the tradition of Nietzsche's genealogy, blends philosophy, history, and a fictional account of how the human concern with truth might have arisen. Without denying that we should worry about the contingency of much that we take for granted, he defends truth as an intellectual objective and a cultural value. He identifies two basic virtues of truth, Accuracy and Sincerity, the first of which aims at finding out the truth and the second at telling it. He describes different psychological and social forms that these virtues have taken and asks what ideas can make best sense of them today. "Truth and Truthfulness" presents a powerful challenge to the fashionable belief that truth has no value, but equally to the traditional faith that its value guarantees itself. Bernard Williams shows us that when we lose a sense of the value of truth, we lose a lot both politically and personally, and may well lose everything.

Written by foremost authorities from cognitive psychology, cognitive science, and cognitive neuroscience, the chapters of this reference summarize basic concepts and facts of a major topic, sketch its history, and analyze the progress its research is currently making. The volume also includes work related to developmental, social and clinical psychology, philosophy, economics, artificial intelligence, linguistics, education, law, and medicine. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning comprises the first comprehensive and authoritative handbook for all core topics within the fields of thinking and reasoning.

本书是著名哲学家陈嘉映教授集四十年从事哲学思考与研究形成的最重要的哲学专著。全书共分九章，以语言分析哲学的方法论述了相关的全部哲学命题，各章包括“哲学之为穷理”，“哲学为什么关注语言”，“哲学语法”，“论理词与论理”，“感知与语言分析”，“亲知与观念”，“看法与论证”，“普遍性：同与通”，“事情本身与事实”等。现代语言分析哲学源出自英国经验主义传统，以分析语言与意义的关系达至问道穷理的目的。陈嘉映教授初入以德国理性主义传统下海德格尔研究入手，从而将西方二十世纪现象学潮流与分析哲学的深入研究紧密无间地结合为一体，形成了自己相对独立的学说体系。该书作者首先以“哲学何为”入手，说“哲学大致就是穷理”：“从一个道理追向另一个道理，谓之穷理。所谓哲学，大致就是穷理”。而穷理，在陈嘉映教授看来，就是一个在一定的哲学语法下对感知和语言进行分析的过程。这一分析在其发展中必会涉及亲身感知与观念形成的问题，进而，陈嘉映教授又探讨这一体系在论证等重大哲学命题。本书论证之深度和论理之严谨使其成为国内近三十年来少见之重要哲学著述，必将引起国内外学界的广泛注意和关注。

'I am not a man, I am dynamite.' Ecce Homo is an autobiography like no other. Deliberately provocative, Nietzsche subverts the conventions of the genre and pushes his philosophical positions to combative extremes, constructing a genius-hero whose life is a chronicle of incessant self-overcoming. Written in 1888, a few weeks before his descent into madness, the book sub-titled 'How To Become What You Are' passes under review all Nietzsche's previous works so that we, his 'posthumous' readers, can finally understand him aright, on his own terms. He reaches final reckonings with his many enemies - Richard Wagner, German nationalism, 'modern men' in general - and above all Christianity, proclaiming himself the Antichrist. Ecce Homo is the summation of an extraordinary philosophical career, a last great testament to Nietzsche's will.

《书写与差异》为作者十一篇论文的结集，德里达运用解构的思想分析集中阐明了分延这一他自造的概念的内涵，它标志着一种奇特的运动，一种各自差异的运动—迂回、间隔、代表、分裂、失衡、距离—的纯粹统一。这些运动表达了一种共同的希求。即对文学书写与结构动机进行探索，并坚持一个基本特点，书写与差异之间的连接点。

《哲学史教程》(下)(精装)的开头篇章在两年前就发表了。经过多次令人不快的延误和干扰之后，此书终于完成，与读者见面了。正如甚至连这种阐述的外部形式也表明的那样，着重点就放在从哲学的观点看最有份量的东西的发展上，即放在问题和概念的历史上。我的主要目的就是将这发展理解为连贯的、相互关联的整体。我们关于宇宙和人生的理论产生于各种思想路线，而这些思想路线在历史上的相互交织便是我研究的特定的对象。我确信这个问题要得到解决不能靠先天的逻辑结构，而只能靠对事实作全面的、毫无偏见的调查研究。如果说，在此书的阐述中，看起来古代部分占去了全书相当大的篇幅，这是基于这种信念：如对人类理智的现实作历史性的了解，那么，用希腊精神从自然界和人生的具体现实中所获得的种种概念来陶冶锻炼，就要比自此以后所有人们思考过的东西更为重要——康德哲学除外。任务这样确定了，就必须割爱；关于这点，没有人比我更为难过了。对哲学的历史发展作纯粹主题的处理，就不容许对哲学家的品格作同他们的真实价值相称的深刻描述。这只有当在概念的结合和转化过程中他们的品格可以作为原因因素而起积极作用时才可能触及。为了有利于更好地深入洞察心灵发展过程内在联系的必然性，在此不得不牺牲推动哲学发展的伟大人物的个人风格中的艺术魅力，不得不牺牲赋予学术讲演以及赋予哲学史更广泛的阐述的特殊技巧的艺术魅力。

内容简介
意大利学者焦万尼•巴蒂斯达•维柯（Giovanni Battista Vico）被广泛认为是现代第一位历史哲学家，但这一判断很大程度上是以他1744年的晦涩难解的代表作《新科学》为依据的。马克•里拉在这部新的研究中提出，维柯是最惹人争议的反现代思想家之一，从而让他的形象更为复杂。
马克•里拉结合维柯被人忽视的形而上学和法学著作来考虑，揭示了这位哲学家对现代观点强烈的保留态度，并说明了他的历史哲学是如何恰恰从这些怀疑中产生的。而在维柯的尚未有英译本的自然法论著《普遍法权》（1720—1722）中，维柯就完全是以一位政治思想家和神学思想家的面貌出现的，他拥护理想化的罗马的权威传统，反对现代生活中普遍腐化的怀疑主义。维柯明确把这种怀疑主义归咎于现代哲学的创建者们，特别是笛卡儿。由于被纳入他对怀疑主义的批判背景中，维柯的历史“新科学”就呈现在全新的视角中了。虽然它在形式上是现代的，但仍能在此看到它的本来面目：对神的权威的一种悲观辩护，借以反对体现着现代特征的自由与理性。
本书首次对维柯进行真正全面的评介，并在评介中，把维柯对权威、政治和民政宗教的关注与他的历史理论结合了起来。同样，对于与我们时代的历史科学和社会科学有关的反现代传统的后续发展，他也提出了一些争论性问题。本书是纠正对维柯的“通常”解读的一剂良药，也将改变我们对维柯的研究。
评论
里拉用维柯的方法来研究《新科学》，他的目的是要给维柯思想的诞生一个清晰的描述……他已经给我们贡献了第一本真正“历史的”维柯评介。他的成就还不止这些。他还给出了维柯关于权威、政治和民政宗教的理论的一切要素各自的正确关系。《新科学》的一切更“科学的”方面都按照各自正确的思想背景在本书中得以展现。
——哈里斯（H.S. Harris），约克大学
作者令人信服地把维柯描述为既是保守分子，同时又是革命分子。说维柯是保守分子，是因为他强烈关切为传统的宗教概念、哲学概念和法学概念辩护，反对新的现代哲学概念；说他是革命分子，是因为就在他为这些传统概念辩护的行动当中，他又改造了这些概念……本书恢复了维柯贯穿始终的神学关切的核心地位，从而扩大了我们对《新科学》的认识。
——凯特•贝克尔（Keith Baker），斯坦福大学

本书收入作者关于科学哲学的五篇重要论文，集中体现了作者的科学哲学观和历史方法论。书中批判了波普尔的证伪主义方法论与库恩的非理性主义科学心理学，提出了一个理论演替的合理的动态的科学发展模式，主张以科学史检验科学方法论，并倡导以典型历史实例进行“案例研究”的方法。

帕菲特是当代著名哲学和伦理学家，其代表作《理与人》一书被誉为自西季威克的《伦理学方法》问一个世纪以来最伟大的实证道德哲学著作。本书围绕着“理”与“人”这两个主题，深入细致地分析了历史上人们在这两方面所秉持的一系列代表性观点和理论，指出人们对自身本性和行动理由的把握其实存在许多虚妄之处。作者借助大量的例子和缜密的推理，不仅比较和提示了人类行动的内在基础，而且从理性，道德和人的本性诸层面对一些传统上信以为真的道德信念和观念提出了强有力的挑战。该书出版后对西方伦理学的发展方向产生了公认的革命性影响，无论是在元伦理学方面还是在应用伦理学方面都占有无可替代的地位。本书还是著名的“哈佛教材”之一。

Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia is a powerful, philosophical challenge to the most widely held political and social positions of our age ---- liberal, socialist and conservative. "Individuals have rights," Nozick writes in his opening sentence, "and there are things no person or group may do to them without violating their rights." The work that follows is a sophisticated and passionate defence of the rights of the individual as opposed to the state. The author argues that the state is justified only when it is severely limited to the narrow function of protection against force, theft and fraud and to the enforcement of contracts. Any more extensive activities by the state, he demonstrates, will inevitably violate individual rights. Among the many achievements of the work are an important new theory of distributive justice, a model of utopia, and an integration of ethics, legal philosophy and economic theory into a profound position in political philosophy which will be discussed for years to come.

结构主义及解构主义的时代，法国知识界激情燃烧的岁月。法国知识分子经历了痛苦的磨难。他们曾经喜怒哀乐，他们曾经悲欢离合，他们曾为卑迪斯科者鸣冤叫屈，他们曾为刽子手高唱赞歌……总之是有血有肉的人生，总之是曲折动人的感情，总之是惊涛骇浪的思想，总之是那个时代特有的强烈共鸣。思想的来龙去脉，人物的恩恩怨怨，思潮的跌宕起伏，道德路的波折坎河……尽在其中矣，他们最终创造一个崭新的知识王国，重绘了人类的知识地图，改变了世界的知识走向，成为20世界最具冲击力的思想之源。

《历史哲学:后结构主义路径》辑录了利奥塔、斯皮瓦克、本尼特、卡勒等当代思想大师的宏论，主题包括历史学、马克思主义和机制。延导与历史，美学与历史，历史作为文本等，极大地扩展了对黑格尔、马克思、尼采和弗洛伊德的研究和评价。

In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.