1． 破除今人对民国学人、学术的不实“想象”，还晚清民国学术一个本来面貌——今人或是对民国学术无限憧憬留恋，或是认为当下的学术总体上已经超越民国时期学术发展的水准。本书所收十篇文章，以扎实的史料为基础，深入、全面地展示了民国学人及其学术的真实样貌，为我们理解近代中国学术思想变迁提供了重要的读本。
2． 考究学人间的往来交游与人事联系，回归晚清民国的具体时空，重新解读张之洞、梁启超、王国维、傅斯年、顾颉刚、金毓黻等人的学术思想——运用记录学人言行的直接材料，参酌其他报刊、档案、回忆录等资料，大体还原这些学人的历史轨迹，在全面还原事实的基础上，力求探寻各说各话背后的隐情真意；民国学人身处千载不遇的大变局之中，世风与学风相互激荡下，张之洞、梁启超、王国维、马裕藻、金毓黻、陈寅恪、胡适、傅斯年等学人如何自处？
3． 重新梳理陈寅恪、傅斯年等学人的史学思想及其关联，回应思想史上的重要议题——“了解之同情”能否全面反映陈寅恪的史学思想？如何理解胡适提出的 “白话文学为中国文学之正宗”，以及陈寅恪所说 “中国文学当以文言为正宗”？傅斯年如何看待西学？这一观念是否发生了变化，变化的动因何在？傅斯年、陈寅恪对宋代和清代学术有何看法？傅斯年与陈寅恪二人关系究竟如何？傅斯年留学后学术观念的突变与陈寅恪有何关系？陈寅恪、傅斯年、冯友兰等人对新儒学产生的观点分歧是什么？……。
4． 探讨影响中国近代思想、学术变迁的重要议题，把握学术风气的流转和学界世态的炎凉——《教会学校与西体中用》从教会学校切入，探讨近代世界一体化进程后发展国家民族的普遍难题：中学、西学，何为体、何为用？全盘西化还是中西汇通融合？在西学与中学将近半个世纪的争夺中，教会学校扮演了怎样的角色？《“中国哲学”探源》梳理“中国哲学”概念的发生及入华过程，探讨跨文化传通与权力渗透的深层关系。《文与言的分与合：重估五四时期的白话文》在整个近代汉语言文字演变的历史进程之中，重估白话文的成败得失……把握中国近代社会历史的重要关节，理清中国近代思想脉络及流风遗泽。
本书是桑兵教授多年来发表于各种学术期刊上的文章结集，共计十篇。这些曾在学界引起重大反响的文章，现统摄在“学人与学风”这一主题下，文章间有机结合，既有对学风产生的历史条件、社会环境的高明洞彻之把握，又有对学人的学术成就、治学方法的客观条理之辨析，同时寄寓作者本人的治学心得于其中，亦对当下的学人与学风有着借鉴和针砭意义。是史学专门领域研究的一部力作。
桑兵对晚清民国学术生态的剖析和呈现，一是有助于读者对当时的学人及其学术有全面深入的了解，获得恰如其分的整体判断和具体把握，并借鉴反思陈寅恪、傅斯年、金毓黻等学人的治学态度和方法；同时，书中也寄托了作者对当下学术生态的批判和期望，使人反思当下重指标、重名利的学术乱象。

《南渡北归》三部曲全景描绘了抗日战争时期流亡西南的知识分子与民族精英多样的命运和学术追求。
所谓“南渡北归”，即作品中的大批知识分子冒着抗战的炮火由中原迁往西南之地，尔后再回归中原的故事。
整部作品的时间跨度近一个世纪，所涉人物囊括了二十世纪人文科学领域的大部分大师级人物，如蔡元培、王国维、梁启超、梅贻琦、陈寅恪、钱锺书等。作品对这些知识分子群体命运作了细致的探查与披露，对各种因缘际会和埋藏于历史深处的人事纠葛、爱恨情仇进行了有理有据的释解，读来令人心胸豁然开朗的同时，又不胜唏嘘，扼腕浩叹。
本著是《南渡北归》第一部，描述了抗战爆发前后，中国知识分子和民族精英的生活，以及从敌占区流亡西南的故事。时间从1937年七七卢沟桥事变始，继之平津沦陷，北大、清华、南开等大学南渡西迁，先长沙后昆明、蒙自办学的岁月，同时涉及中央研究院史语所、同济大学、中国营造学社在抗战烽火中艰难跋涉的历程。突出地描写了蔡元培、胡适、陈寅恪、傅斯年、梁思成、李济、林徽因、金岳霖、梅贻琦、冯友兰等大知识分子的生活、学术、精神与情操，搜罗宏富，规模宏大，意旨宏远，堪称中国知识分子抗战时期的群雕。

《南渡北归2:北归》：所谓“南渡北归”，即作品中的大批知识分子冒着抗战的炮火由中原迁往西南之地，尔后再回归中原的故事。整部作品的时间跨度近一个世纪，所涉人物囊括了二十世纪人文科学领域的大部分大师级人物，如蔡元培、王国维、梁启超、梅贻琦、陈寅恪、钱锺书等。作品对这些知识分子群体命运作了细致的探查与披露，对各种因缘际会和埋藏于历史深处的人事纠葛、爱恨情仇进行了有理有据的释解，读来令人心胸豁然开朗的同时，又不胜唏嘘，扼腕浩叹。《南渡北归2:北归》是《南渡北归》第二部，着重描述了抗战胜利前后，流亡西南的知识分子的学术追求、思想变化与不同的人生遭际，时间跨度约为抗战中后期至 1948年末，国民政府抢运国宝与“抢救学人”计划，连同选举首届中央研究院院士为止。突出地再现了董作宾、李约瑟、童第周、陶孟和、沈性仁、梁思永、蒋梦麟、闻一多、刘文典、罗庸、郑天挺、吴晗等中外知识分子，在民族危亡的艰难岁月里，颠沛流离，不屈不挠的坚强意志。从不同的角度还原了西南联大学潮与闻一多被刺案真相，对自由知识分子群体于时代大潮中的分化与演变，作了深入细致的探究，被蓄意掩盖的历史隐秘得到了充分揭示。<br><br>海报：<br><br/><img src=http://g-ec4.images-amazon.com/images/G/28/BOOK-Catalog/Liaoxiaojun/B004INFYO2_01_AMZN.jpg>

《南渡北归3:离别(震撼大结局)》内容简介：所谓“南渡北归”，即作品中的大批知识分子冒着抗战的炮火由中原迁往西南之地，尔后再回归中原的故事。
整部作品的时间跨度近一个世纪，所涉人物囊括了二十世纪人文科学领域的大部分大师级人物，如蔡元培、王国维、梁启超、梅贻琦、陈寅恪、钱锺书等。作品对这些知识分子群体命运作了细致的探查与披露，对各种因缘际会和埋藏于历史深处的人事纠葛、爱恨情仇进行了有理有据的释解，读来令人心胸豁然开朗的同时，又不胜唏嘘，扼腕浩叹。
《南渡北归3:离别(震撼大结局)》是《南渡北归》第三部，描述了流亡西南的知识分子，在回归久违的故土家园之后，因内战爆发和各自的政治歧见，不得不忍痛离别，遥天相望，以及在海峡两岸不同的生活环境和政治氛围中所遭遇的命运剧变。除述及迁往台湾的几位大师级人物，着重描述了留在大陆的吴金鼎、曾昭抡、曾昭燏、陈梦家、穆旦、向达、叶企孙、饶毓泰、吴宓、钱锺书等知识分子群体，不同的政治追求与爱恨情仇。令读者感知历史真相并扼腕浩叹的同时，也生发出“在史中求史识”的冲动，并从中吸取一些“历史的教训”。
海报：

Reverberations of Nazi Violence in Germany and Beyond explores the complex and diverse reverberations of the Second World War after 1945. It focuses on the legacies that National Socialist violence and genocide perpetrated in Europe continue to have in German-speaking countries and communities, as well as among those directly affected by occupation, terror and mass murder. Furthermore it explores how those legacies are in turn shaped by the present.
The volume also considers conflicting, unexpected and often dissonant interpretations and representations of these events, made by those who were the witnesses, victims and perpetrators at the time and also by different communities in the generations that followed. The contributions, from a range of disciplinary perspectives, enrich our understanding of the complexity of the ways in which a disturbing past continues to disrupt the present and how the past is in turn disturbed and instrumentalized by a later present.

For over half a century, Germans have lived in the shadow of Auschwitz. Who was responsible for the mass murder of millions of people in the Holocaust: just a small gang of evil men, Hitler and his henchmen; or certain groups within a particular system; or even the whole nation? Could the roots of malignancy be traced far back in German history? Or did the Holocaust have more to do with European modernity? Should Germans live with a legacy of guilt forever? And how, if at all, could an acceptable German national identity be defined? These questions dogged public debates in both East and West Germany in the long period of division. Both states officially claimed to have "overcome the past" more effectively than the other; both sought to construct new, opposing identities as the "better Germany". But, in different ways, official claims ran at odds with the kaleidoscope of popular collective memories; dissonances, sensitivities and taboos were the order of the day on both sides of the Wall. And in the 1990s, with continued heated debates over past and present, it was clear that inner unity appeared to be no automatic consequence of formal unification. Drawing on a wide range of material - from landscapes of memory and rituals of commemoration, through private diaries, oral history interviews and public opinion poll surveys, to the speeches of politicians and the writings of professional historians - Fulbrook provides a clear analysis of key controversies, events and patterns of historical and national consciousness in East and West Germany in equal depth. Arguing against "essentialist" conceptions of the nation, Fulbrook presents a theory of the nation as a constructed community of shared legacy and common destiny, and shows how the conditions for the easy construction of any such identity have been notably lacking in Germany after the Holocaust. This book will be of interest to advanced undergraduate and postgraduate students in history, politics, and German and European Studies, as well as established scholars and interested members of the public.

What has Germany made of its Nazi past? This book explores the legacy of the Nazi regime, exposing the workings of past beliefs and political interests and how differently the two Germanys have recalled the crimes of Nazism, from the anti-Nazi emigration of the 1930s through the establishment of a day of remembrance for the victims of National Socialism in 1996. The author asks why would German politicians raise the spectre of the Holocaust at all, in view of the considerable depth of support its instigators and their agenda had found in Nazi Germany. Why did the public memory of Nazi anti-Jewish persecution and the Holocaust emerge, if selectively, in West Germany, yet was repressed and marginalized in "anti-fascist" East Germany? The book aims to answer this question and more, revealing the relationship between how the crimes of Nazism were publicly recalled and how East and West Germany separately evolved a Communist dictatorship and a liberal democracy. The author uses private and public papers and statements of key German figures to explore the subject and to place it within its historical context and the ideologies and experiences of pre-1945 German and European history to the Cold War.

The ancient story of King Goujian, a psychologically complex fifth-century BCE monarch, spoke powerfully to the Chinese during China's turbulent twentieth century. Yet most Americans—even students and specialists of this era—have never heard of Goujian. In Speaking to History, Paul A. Cohen opens this previously missing (to the West) chapter of China's recent history. He connects the story to each of the major traumas of the last century, tracing its versatility as a source of inspiration and hope and elegantly exploring, on a more general level, why such stories often remain sealed up within a culture, unknown to outsiders. Labeling this phenomenon "insider cultural knowledge," Cohen investigates the relationship between past story and present reality. He inquires why at certain moments in their collective lives peoples are especially drawn to narratives from the distant past that resonate strongly with their current circumstances, and why the Chinese have returned over and over to a story from twenty-five centuries ago. In this imaginative stitching of story to history, Cohen reveals how the shared narratives of a community help to define its culture and illuminate its history.

Robert G. Moeller powerfully conveys the complicated story of how West Germans recast the recent past after the Second World War. He rejects earlier characterizations of a postwar West Germany dominated by attitudes of "forgetting" or silence about the Nazi past. He instead demonstrates the "selective remembering" that took place among West Germans during the postwar years: in particular, they remembered crimes committed against Germans, crimes that--according to some contemporary accounts--were comparable to the crimes of Germans against Jews. Moeller draws on a wide range of U.S. and German government documents, political debates, film archives, letters, oral histories, and newspaper accounts.

Broken glass, twisted beams, piles of debris - these are the early memories of the children who grew up amidst the ruins of the Third Reich. More than five decades later, German youth inhabit manicured suburbs and stroll along prosperous pedestrian malls. "Shattered Past" is a bold reconsideration of the perplexing pattern of Germany's twentieth-century history. Konrad Jarausch and Michael Geyer explore the staggering gap between the country's role in the terrors of war and its subsequent success as a democracy. They argue that the collapse of Communism, national reunification, and the postmodern shift call for a new reading of the country's turbulent development, one that no longer suggests continuity but rupture and conflict. Comprising original essays, the book begins by reexamining the nationalist, socialist, and liberal master narratives that have dominated the presentation of German history but are now losing their hold. Treated next are major issues of recent debate that suggest how new kinds of German history might be written: annihilationist warfare, complicity with dictatorship, the taming of power, the impact of migration, the struggle over national identity, redefinitions of womanhood, and the development of consumption as well as popular culture. The concluding chapters reflect on the country's gradual transition from chaos to civility. This penetrating study will spark a fresh debate about the meaning of the German past during the last century. There is no single master narrative, no Weltgeist, to be discovered. But there is a fascinating story to be told in many different ways.

The Berlin Wall crumbled amidst fears that a united Germany might seek too quickly to put its Nazi past behind it, inaugurating a new era of triumphant nationalism. What happened instead was surprising: behind the flag-waving arose a more public, thoughtful, and realistic scrutiny of the country's horrific legacy than ever before seen in postwar Germany. Facing the Nazi Past shows how the readiness of a newly united people, combined with an explosion of media events, gave birth to a collaborative, determined effort to reexamine and accept the past.
The reunification of Germany brought an end to a certain way of looking at the Third Reich. As long as Germany was divided, guilt for National Socialism could be passed back and forth over the border. However with one Germany the past is now shard by all Germans, and if the country is to be psychologically as well as geographically united, then it will have to be on the basis of accepting a common past, both the good and bad.
Drawing on archival research, newspaper reports, and historical documents, Facing the Nazi Past casts a new light on the history and legacy of Nazism. Together, Germans are shaping a more inclusive memory of the past, and a more inclusive, pluralist society in the future.

Paris, 1933: three contemporaries meet over apricot cocktails at the Bec-de-Gaz bar on the rue Montparnasse. They are the young Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and longtime friend Raymond Aron, a fellow philosopher who raves to them about a new conceptual framework from Berlin called Phenomenology. “You see,” he says, “if you are a phenomenologist you can talk about this cocktail and make philosophy out of it!”
It was this simple phrase that would ignite a movement, inspiring Sartre to integrate Phenomenology into his own French, humanistic sensibility, thereby creating an entirely new philosophical approach inspired by themes of radical freedom, authentic being, and political activism. This movement would sweep through the jazz clubs and cafés of the Left Bank before making its way across the world as Existentialism.
Featuring not only philosophers, but also playwrights, anthropologists, convicts, and revolutionaries, At the Existentialist Café follows the existentialists’ story, from the first rebellious spark through the Second World War, to its role in postwar liberation movements such as anticolonialism, feminism, and gay rights. Interweaving biography and philosophy, it is the epic account of passionate encounters—fights, love affairs, mentorships, rebellions, and long partnerships—and a vital investigation into what the existentialists have to offer us today, at a moment when we are once again confronting the major questions of freedom, global responsibility, and human authenticity in a fractious and technology-driven world.

2012年坎迪尔（Cundill Prize）历史奖大奖（世界奖金最高的历史著作奖）
裴士锋生动重现了……十九世纪中叶的太平天国战争。这场战争所夺走的人命之多，在人类史上名列前茅。它的深远影响，在当今中国仍未消失。《天国之秋》是由第一流历史学家和杰出作家完成的引人入胜之 作。
——基辛格（Henry A. Kissinger） 《论中国》《大外交》等书作者
精心琢磨的历史铺陈，是极出色的典范。从一八五〇年代初期打至一八六四年的这场中国内战，可能是人类史上死伤最惨烈的内战；裴士锋以生动翔实的手法，呈现中国的统治者及其数千万子民的命运如何受到英国外交与商业利益的摆布，如何受到太平天国本身的非正统宗教和政治理念影响。一个悲惨且撼动人心的故事。
——史景迁（Jonathan Spence） 《追寻现代中国》《大汗之国》等书作者

本书收录了钱理群先生最具代表性的文章38篇。分为世纪思想遗产、知识者的心路历程、精神死亡的大悲剧、寻找“精神界战士”四辑，代表了钱先生20世纪90年代的思想成果。透过这些朴素而真实的文字，能够体味出钱先生人格的魅力和灵魂的呐喊，不愧为真正的“精神界战士”。
本书曾在全国引起巨大轰动，应广大读者要求，而今得以再版。

我們該如何詮釋中國共產黨出人意料的革命軌跡？為什麼中國共產黨會走上與俄國模式大相逕庭的道路？裴宜理教授認為，箇中原因在於中國共產黨從革命起義到奪取政權及之後的各階段中創新地發展和部署文化資源。毛澤東、他的同志們以及其繼任者通過精巧地運用「文化置位」和「文化操控」建立其獨有的政治形態，使人們逐漸接受那曾經陌生的共產主義體系，成為熟悉的「中國特點」。在革命初期，毛澤東和黨的早期領導人曾在安源煤礦發動過一次影響深遠的工人運動，裴宜理教授以此地為案例進行分析。安源曾被認為是「中國的小莫斯科」，其所象徵的獨特的中國革命傳統逐漸成為中國語境下「政治正確」的試金石。在當代中國學界為尋求嶄新的政治前景而就其過往的革命歷史進行爭論時，裴宜理教授對充滿爭議的中國革命傳統之意涵進行了深入分析。
「本書帶有裴宜理明顯的個人風格：優雅而清晰的文筆、充足又前所未聞的原始資料、對於基層政治參與者人性細節的充分描述等。這些特點不僅使本書的敘事引人入勝，而且也對主題提供了清晰有效的分析。裴宜理對安源的觀點原創而新穎，就這一地區對革命所作的持續貢獻進行分析，使之成為一個令人信服的案例分析。」
──周錫瑞 (Joseph W. Esherick)，加州大學聖地亞哥分校，著有Ancestral Leaves: A Family Journey through Chinese History
「裴宜理從中國共產主義革命的源頭，探討安源工人運動的歷史，揭示1920年代毛澤東、李立三和劉少奇三位共產黨員如何利用文化資源在安源煤礦發動一次影響深遠的工人運動，並詳述1949年革命勝利以後，當權者如何扭曲和操弄安源工人運動的歷史，藉以築造和淨化革命傳統，更討論改革開放以後，官方和民間如何透過各種文化媒介如美術、電影、小說、學術和紅色旅遊等來回憶、重現或挪用安源的革命過往。作者相信中國的未來將取決於如何發掘、認識和掌握中國共產主義革命的傳統，她在安源革命傳統的溯源和發掘上開創了一個學習典範。」
──陳永發，中央研究院院士，著有《中國共產革命七十年》
「在越來越多的研究者轉去挖掘查找毛澤東時代中國失敗的各種原因的時候，裴宜理教授的這本書可謂獨樹一幟。作者不僅直截了當地追問那些只着眼於批判的學者，而且致力於重建當年特定的歷史場景，並用同情的眼光來了解那段歷史形成的複雜原因，以求回答那些有關中共歷史成敗的令人困擾的問題。比如，如果毛澤東等人向來偏激且無情，那麼他們當年在幾乎不掌握任何國家機器的條件下，又如何能夠影響數百萬計的底層民眾，使之信服並願為他們的革命事業而犧牲呢。」
──楊奎松，中共黨史研究專家，華東師範大學特聘教授

1948年，中国的社会与政治面临着重大变局，文化生态与文化体制即将迎来深刻的变化，然而山雨欲来风满楼，谁能穿越世事纷纭，看透历史的变数？被郭沫若斥为“粉红色”作家的沈从文，在一封信里透露出了深刻的历史预感：“大局玄黄未定……一切终得变。从大处看发展，中国行将进入一个崭新时代，则无可怀疑。”
本书在参考大量报刊、日记、书信、传记、回忆录等资料的基础上，从具体的历史细节进入1948年的历史现场，广泛涉及文学作品、歌曲、演出、出版、校园文化、文学与政治的互动等等各个方面，通过对朱自清、萧军、胡风、丁玲、赵树理、沈从文等著名文化人个体命运的揭示，探讨了文学与政治、知识分子与政治权力的种种纠葛，对共和国初期文化体制的形态及成因进行了深刻的分析。
本书材料丰富，文字生动，叙述富有张力与内在激情。虽是历史著作，但洋溢着强烈的现实关怀，是钱理群先生备受好评的代表作之一，也是了解那段历史，乃至当代共和国史的重要著作。
目录：
一、面对转折——1948年1、2月
毛泽东《目前形势和我们的任务》的冲击波——《人民日报》传出的信息——蒋介石的元旦训词——《文艺先锋》宣布的官方文化政策——《大公报》和中国自由主义知识分子的信仰
二、南方大出击——1948年3月()
《大众文艺丛刊》与中共对文艺的领导——文学党性原则的明确提出——“我们”文体的新特征 ——以思想斗争（批判）为发展文艺的中心环节——三面出击：郭沫若怒“斥”沈从文、朱光潜、萧乾代表的“反动文艺”；批判路翎、姚雪垠、骆宾基等作家的小资产阶级创作倾向；对胡风及其朋友的批判与警告——对西方资本主义文化的警惕与防范——以解放区文艺为样板的“人民文艺”的大力倡导——新的美学原则，文艺创作、批评模式在建立中——对五四与鲁迅的再评价：争取文化领导权与正统地位的自觉努力
三、校园风暴——1948年4、5、6月()
学生运动与校园文化——群众歌曲的革命功能——革命盛大节日里的活报剧演出——漫画：精神原子弹——朗诵诗的政治性、群体性与行动性——狂欢的广场文学（艺术）——大学教师在学潮中——自由主义教授的困境、挣扎与分化——师生共识：为自由、民主的新中国而斗争
四、诗人的分化——1948年6、7月()
40年代末的诗歌刊物与流派——前期《诗创造》的兼容并包性——在内外压力中挣扎—— 新的现代主义诗歌流派的孕育与聚集——《诗创造》的改组与《中国新诗》的创刊——40年代末现代主义诗歌与革命现实主义诗歌的相通与对立——“中国新诗” 派诗人与七月派诗人的相通与分歧——共同的命运
五、批判萧军——1948年8月（一）()
萧军：永远的精神流浪汉——集权、秩序、规范与独立、反叛、自由之间——萧军与王实味事件——《文化报》与《生活报》的论战——大规模的有组织、有领导的“批判萧军反动思想”的运动——五四启蒙主义话语与革命话语的争夺战——知识分子与新政权的关系——言论自由的尺度——知识分子“自由职业者”身份的消失——“大批判”思维、文体的开创——对“革命的小资产阶级”出示黄牌——人们期待中的萧军的反应
六、朱自清逝世前后——1948年8月（二）()
朱自清的“背影”——晚年心境的沉重面——1928年《那里走》的困惑，二十年后再思考——对知识分子边缘位置的正视与“悬空感”——向下层人民寻求支撑点的欲求与害怕失去自己的矛盾——既“调整”又“保持”的文化（学术）选择—— 沟通五四个性主义话语与集体主义革命话语，沟通精英文化与平民文化——雅俗共赏、兼容并包、多元发展的文化理想——本不合时宜，却被大用的结局——追悼中的“学者与文人”的朱自清——朱自清转变问题的提出——革命话语对朱自清的改造——革命话语与民族主义话语的结合：毛泽东的盖棺论定
七、胡风的回答——1948年9月（一）()
胡风向“明天”扑去——他眼里的路翎《财主底儿女们》的异质性与挑战性——受伤的狼的突围与出击——以斗争为中心的思维、情感与心态：批判者与被批判者的同一——自觉地捍卫五四传统：“与无形的封建的中国的斗争”；坚持启蒙主义；反对向 “旧形式”投降——胡风要为他漠视批判者的警告付出代价——胡风与毛泽东心灵的相通——胡风的悲剧：从支持（拥护）出发的对抗——留下的最后一个美好的记忆
八、“新的小说的诞生”——1948年9月（二）()
丁玲与《太阳照在桑乾河上》的命运——社会主义现实主义创作模式的诞生—— 纳入体制：文学生产与传播的计划化——创作主体的变化：首先是党的干部、战士，然后是作家——以党的政策为创作起点与接受终点——文学的真正主人：革命化的“新人（工、农、兵英雄人物）”——把党的意识形态化为作家的艺术思维：阶级斗争的艺术想象逻辑（题材、人物创造、结构等）——用党的革命语言规范一切 ——《太阳照在桑乾河上》、《暴风骤雨》（周立波）对社会主义现实主义创作模式的示范意义与部分背离——独断话语权的文学秩序的建立
九、战地歌声——1948年10月()
部队宣传队（文工团）：中国人民解放军的独创——泛黄的历史资料所留下的记忆——把毛泽东 “文艺为政治服务”的思想推向极致：文艺军事化的新范式——快板诗人与“兵写兵”群众运动——革命话语对民间话语的利用与改造：北方农村的演剧与诗歌创作运动——对农民文化的推崇与对市民文化的拒绝——《斜不压正》：赵树理的“党的立场”与“农民的立场”的统一与矛盾，他的文学命运的戏剧性
十、北方教授的抉择——1948年11月()
沈从文的文学梦想——对五四先驱者蔡元培“以美育代宗教”思想的继承与发展，“二十世纪最后一个浪漫派”的历史定位——《看虹录》：将“抽象的抒情”引入小说叙事的自我突破，却一再受到批判——40年代末以沈从文为中心的，以探索、实验为追求的北方青年作家群，同样被遗忘——沈从文终于“觉悟”：不能随着时代变动而改变自己，只能面对“提前死亡”——“投岩麝退香”：沈从文和他的朋友呼吁“文物保卫”——大多数知识分子的左倾，少数人退守思想文化上的自由主义——“今日文学的方向”座谈会上沈从文、废名、朱光潜、冯至等讨论“如何对待红绿灯的指挥”等问题
十一、南下与北上——1948年12月()
毛泽东三次急电平津战役前线指挥部：必须保护文物与知识分子——蒋介石亲自组织“抢救 ”学界知名人士——“危舟将倾”的末世景象，旧秩序再也无法维持——知识者故土难舍，“为伊消得人憔悴”——国民党高压政策为渊驱鱼——走下飞机的仅胡适等人——梁实秋：战乱中的生离死别——枪炮声中的北京大学五十周年校庆——“天下愈乱吾心愈治”：无人顾及中的学术坚守——《浦江清日记》里“三不管”地界中的清华园——稀落、仓皇的“南下”与浩荡、有序的“北上”：两股知识分子人流——“我今真解放”：郭沫若一路高歌——卞之琳等远方归来：赤子的虔诚
不算尾声()
叶圣陶终于“远行”，结束游离状态——郑振铎重读《画梦录》——胡风想起小贩挣扎的叫卖声，他没有在香港“净罪” ——路翎写《危楼日记》，为“时代末日”作忠实记录——丁玲作为新中国的女作家在国际舞台亮相，她感到无比自豪——《传家宝》：赵树理仍在关注农村现实中的“问题”；老赵进城的意义与困惑——萧军的消失：又一个“提前死亡”——清华大学中文系师生游乐会上处处感到“他”的存在——一颗无声的政治炮弹，沈从文的绝望与去不掉的迫害感——“今日复何悔”：胡适、傅斯年凄然对饮吟陶诗——国民党政府“最后的晚餐”——张道藩拜别母墓悄然离开南京——倾听“北方” 的声音：毛泽东《将革命进行到底》开始了一个新时代
年表（1946～1953）()
参考文献()
我怎样想与写这本书——代后记()
再版后记()

A brilliant account of religion's role in the political thinking of the West, from the Enlightenment to the close of World War II.
The wish to bring political life under God's authority is nothing new, and it's clear that today religious passions are again driving world politics, confounding expectations of a secular future. In this major book, Mark Lilla reveals the sources of this age-old quest-and its surprising role in shaping Western thought. Making us look deeper into our beliefs about religion, politics, and the fate of civilizations, Lilla reminds us of the modern West's unique trajectory and how to remain on it. Illuminating and challenging, The Stillborn God is a watershed in the history of ideas.

民族主義研究的必讀經典
《想像的共同體》自1983年問世以來，不但使學界對民族與民族主義課題的思考角度產生哥白尼式的徹底翻轉，其深刻影響也廣及人文與社會學科的各個領域。除了被譯成三十一種語言出版之外，甚至成為一種近乎教科書的作品，遠遠超乎作者的預料。
安德森從文化內涵的改變與印刷資本主義的興起來探討民族主義的源起，並辨析民族主義在美洲誕生，被歐洲的群眾運動挪用，被帝國政權吸納，再到亞非兩洲以民族主義為號召的反帝國主義抗爭的數百年過程。
此次中文增訂版收錄了安德森於2006年新添的一章，概略檢視了此書所造成的影響，並探討此書在世界各地的出版與反應情況；另外更收錄了2003年作者兩篇關於臺灣處境的研討會講稿，以及譯者訪談這位學術大師的深情記敘。

Writing in the June 1965 issue of the "Economic Journal", Harry G. Johnson begins with a sentence seemingly calibrated to the scale of the book he set himself to review: 'The long-awaited "Monetary History of the United States" by Friedman and Schwartz is in every sense of the term a monumental scholarly achievement - monumental in its sheer bulk, monumental in the definitiveness of its treatment of innumerable issues, large and small ...monumental, above all, in the theoretical and statistical effort and ingenuity that have been brought to bear on the solution of complex and subtle economic issues'.Friedman and Schwartz marshaled massive historical data and sharp analytics to support the claim that monetary policy - steady control of the money supply - matters profoundly in the management of the nation's economy, especially in navigating serious economic fluctuations. In their influential chapter 7, "The Great Contraction" - which Princeton published in 1965 as a separate paperback - they address the central economic event of the century, the Depression. According to Hugh Rockoff, writing in January 1965: 'If Great Depressions could be prevented through timely actions by the monetary authority (or by a monetary rule), as Friedman and Schwartz had contended, then the case for market economies was measurably stronger.' Milton Friedman won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2000 for work related to "A Monetary History " as well as to his other Princeton University Press book, "A Theory of the Consumption Function" (1957).