"Legend is overdue for replacement, and an adequate replacement must attend to the process of science as carefully as Hull has done. I share his vision of a serious account of the social and intellectual dynamics of science that will avoid both the rosy blur of Legend and the facile charms of relativism. . . . Because of [Hull's] deep concern with the ways in which research is actually done, "Science as a Process" begins an important project in the study of science. It is one of a distinguished series of books, which Hull himself edits".--Philip Kitcher, "Nature"

本书是尼采的重要作品之一。《朝霞》1881年问世，1887年新版并附有一篇前言，它在著作史上位于《人性的，太人性的》第二部分（1880）与《快乐的科学》（1882）之间。《朝霞》分为五卷，每卷分为长短不同的节，少只有一两行，多则一两页，甚至偶尔长达三页以上。该书比较详细的部分，特别是前三卷，有点像随笔式的短文，其思想素描与其说是巨细无遗的不如说是钩玄提要的。在接下来的讨论中，特别是在第四卷中，每段要更短一些，带有圣经经文的思想风格。寥寥几个句子甚至单独一个句子构成浓缩的和凝练的格言，好像压缩甚至过度压缩的短文。

In this book van Fraassen develops an alternative to scientific realism by constructing and evaluating three mutually reinforcing theories.

本书共6卷，大致按年代顺序编辑而成。但出于各卷篇幅方面的考试，有时也打破了这种顺序。
第1卷收入两部论著：《威拉德·范·奥曼·蒯因自传》和《数理逻辑》
第2卷收入两部论著：《逻辑方法》和《本体论的相对性及其他论文》
第3卷收入两部论著：《集合论及其逻辑》和《逻辑哲学》
第4卷收入三部论著：《从逻辑的观点看》、《指称之根》以及《语词和对象》
第5卷收入两部论著：《悖论的方式及其他论文》和《信念之网》
第6卷收入四部论著：《理论和事物》、《一些离奇的想法——一部不连贯的哲学辞典》、《真之追求》、《从刺激到科学》
以上6卷收入了蒯因的绝大部分逻辑论著和哲学论著，只有少数论著未收入。

库萨的尼古拉（1401—1464），中世纪哲学向近代哲学过渡的一位重要代表人物，研究过法学、神学、哲学、数学。本书是库萨的尼古拉重要的四篇论文的结集，被公认是“否定神学”的珍贵文献。库萨依循否定的方式去论述“隐秘的上帝”：上帝“既非被称道，也非不被称道”，“既不是无，不是不存在，也不是既存在又不存在”；上帝也“不是真理”。“否定神学”的宗旨绝不是消极的否定，而是要通过否定去肯定上帝的一些“真相”。这一点在库萨的论文中表现得尤为突出。从库萨的否定性论述中，时时透露出“隐秘的上帝”的一些肯定的信息。

一位哲学教授之所以对医学产生兴趣，并不一定是为了更好地认识精神疾病，也更不必然是为了进行某项科学训练。我们明确地希望医学成为人类一些具体问题的导引。对我们来说，医学是且仍将是处于几种学科交界处的一种技术或者艺术，而不是严格意义上的科学。在我们看来，为了精确定位和清楚阐发我们所关心的两个问题，即科学与技术的关系，标准与正常的关系问题，就必须从直接的医学文化那里得到帮助。
——康吉莱姆
这个人（他的著作是严肃的）刻意而精心地固守在科学史的一个特定领域（它在任何情况下都不会混同于任何一个特定的学科），却莫名其妙地发现自己出现在了自己一直留意着不要卷入的讨论中。然而，抛开康吉莱姆，你就无法更好地理解阿尔都塞、阿尔都塞主义，无法更好地理解在法国的马克思主义者中所进行的一系列讨论；你也不可能领会像布尔迪厄、卡斯特、帕斯隆的独特之处以及让他们在社会学中引人注目的东西；你也会错过精神分析家的理论著作的整个方面，尤其是拉康的追随者们的著作。更有甚者，在有关1968年运动前后的思想的整个讨论中，我们很容易找到那些或近或远地受过康吉莱姆训练的人的位置。
——福柯

Originally published in German in 1935, this monograph anticipated solutions to problems of scientific progress, the truth of scientific fact and the role of error in science now associated with the work of Thomas Kuhn and others. Arguing that every scientific concept and theory--including his own--is culturally conditioned, Fleck was appreciably ahead of his time. And as Kuhn observes in his foreword, "Though much has occurred since its publication, it remains a brilliant and largely unexploited resource."
"To many scientists just as to many historians and philosophers of science facts are things that simply are the case: they are discovered through properly passive observation of natural reality. To such views Fleck replies that facts are invented, not discovered. Moreover, the appearance of scientific facts as discovered things is itself a social construction, a "made" thing. A work of transparent brilliance, one of the most significant contributions toward a thoroughly sociological account of scientific knowledge."--Steven Shapin, "Science"

《护教篇》共收有德尔图良的五篇护教著作：“护教篇”、“论偶像崇拜”、“论戏剧”、“论花环”和“致斯卡普拉”。这五篇可以基本代表德尔图良在护教学上所取得的辉煌成就。“护教篇”是早期基督教文献中的伟大经典著作之一。

本书是萧沆的代表作，以片段写作的方式，呈现了真实的人生经验，它会破坏你我所有的信念，从心灵到肉体、从宗教到哲学、从出生到终结，任何既定想法，都会在这本书的阅读过程中，全面解体。本书是萧沆的第一部法文作品，被认为“足令法文增辉”，并获法国里瓦罗尔（RIVAROL）奖。

罗马尼亚，1930年代中叶，齐奥朗已然是新生代知识分子心目中的明星作家。他长时间泡在一座特兰西瓦尼亚图书馆里孜孜研读圣徒传记。这位当代的圣徒传作者，“梦想”自己是“这些坠落于天堂与地狱之间（圣徒的）年代记编者，他们内心激情的知己，为上帝而失眠者的历史学家”。在尼采《善恶的彼岸》启发之下，齐奥朗“探寻眼泪的起源”。他自问是否圣徒“会是眼泪那苦涩之光的源头”。
本书于1937年首次出版于罗马尼亚。“有谁知道？”他在书中第一段写道，“可以肯定的是，泪水是他们的踪迹。泪水并非透过圣徒进入这个世界，但若没有圣徒，我们就永远不会明白自己是因为渴念失乐园而哭泣。”“一个人是怎样弃绝自己并走上成圣之路的？”这是齐奥朗的疑问，也是《眼泪与圣徒》这部记录的起点。
齐奥朗关注的并非传统圣徒传中因德性而受崇拜的殉道者和英雄，而是以灵性高度著称的神秘主义者，——首先是女性神秘主义者，他们拥有关于上帝的私密知识，导致又一场“绝对在历史中爆发”。他们中的许多人都留下了经典之作，如埃克哈特大师，圣加大利纳·锡耶纳，圣女大德兰和圣十架约翰。
《眼泪与圣徒》是齐奥朗“在朝圣路上半途而废的挣扎记录”。在对宗教与信仰反复的拷问下，齐奥朗完成了对自己的精神放逐。

本书是当代西方著名社会学家、科学知识社会学的创始人之一和最主要的理论代表大卫•布鲁尔的第一部理论专著，同时也是其最主要的学术著作和科学知识社会学最重要的理论经典著作。作者通过此书提出了科学知识社会学的“强纲领”理论，强调指出包括数学、逻辑学等所谓严格精确的科学在内的一切科学知识，不论其是真是假、是合理还是不合理、是取得了成功还是遭到了失败，都应当而且可以进行社会学上的描述和分析，因为所有这些知识都和人文、社会学科知识一样是由社会建构的，都因此而具有包括文化相对性在内的各种相对性。这些理论观点和学术探索进一步推进了知识社会学的研究进程，对国内读者全面深入地了解知识社会学、更加深入地理解知识与社会的相互关系和相互作用，具有不可或缺的重要意义。
编辑推荐
大卫·布鲁尔编著的《知识和社会意象》提出的论证的科学知识社会学的“强纲领”，通过系统论述科学知识的社会起源和社会维度、强调科学研究的反身性，对这些问题进行了有理有据的回答；它不仅使作者本人成为这个理论阵营的主帅，也使自身变成了当今知识社会学界最重要的经典著作之一。

Donna Haraway analyses accounts, narratives, and stories of the creation of nature, living organisms, and cyborgs (cybernetic components); showing how deeply cultural assumptions penetrate into allegedly value-neutral medical research.

时间，我们存在的基本维度，令艺术家、哲学家和科学家为之陶醉。如今，普里戈金在这本书中向广大读者呈现的，是他与自然之经典描述的彻底决裂。他通过考察西方的时间观，引导我们经历一种奇妙的智力探险——从古希腊出发，经过牛顿轨道和确定性混沌，到达量子理论与“免费午餐”宇宙学统一表述的高度。这本分水岭式的著作表明，一种全新的科学与文化之自然法则诞生了。

A groundbreaking examination of Michel Foucault’s history of truth.
Many blame Michel Foucault for our post-truth and conspiracy-laden society, but Daniele Lorenzini argues that such criticism misunderstands the philosopher’s work: Foucault did not question truth itself but what Lorenzini calls “the force of truth,” or how some truth claims are given the power to govern our conduct while others are not. This interest, Lorenzini shows, drove Foucault not to attack truth but to articulate a new ethics and politics of truth-telling. The Force of Truth explores this dimension of Foucault’s work by putting his writings on regimes of truth and parrhesia in conversation with early analytic philosophy and by drawing out the “possibilizing” elements of Foucault’s genealogies that remain vital for practicing critique today.

This is a new translation of two essential works on Deleuze, written by one of his contemporaries. From the publication of "Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event" to his untimely death in 2006, Francois Zourabichvili was regarded as one of the most important new voices of contemporary philosophy in France. His work continues to make an essential contribution to Deleuze scholarship today. This edition makes two of Zourabichvili's most important writings on the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze available in a single volume. "A Philosophy of the Event" (1994) is an exposition of Deleuze's philosophy as a whole, while the complementary "The Vocabulary of Deleuze" (2003) approaches Deleuze's work through an analysis of key concepts in a dictionary form. Key features: singles out the three most controversial questions in debates surrounding Deleuze's philosophy today: univocity, creative vitalism and the event and with an introduction by Gregg Lambert and Daniel W. Smith, two of the world's leading commentators on Deleuze.

本书是当代美国著名科学哲学家保罗·法伊尔阿本德的代表作。作者激烈抨击唯理主义科学方法论的主要倾向，论证说最成功的科学研究从来不是按照理性方法进行的，不应要求科学家遵奉某一种方法论从事科学活动，而应以知识论无政府主义取代理性主义，充分发挥科学家的独创性，倡导著名的“怎么都行”的方法论原则。本书观点独特，自成一家，在西方学术界影响甚大。

Striving to boldly redirect the philosophy of science, this book by renowned philosopher Philip Kitcher examines the heated debate surrounding the role of science in shaping our lives. Kitcher explores the sharp divide between those who believe that the pursuit of scientific knowledge is always valuable and necessary--the purists--and those who believe that it invariably serves the interests of people in positions of power. In a daring turn, he rejects both perspectives, working out a more realistic image of the sciences--one that allows for the possibility of scientific truth, but nonetheless permits social consensus to determine which avenues to investigate. He then proposes a democratic and deliberative framework for responsible scientists to follow.
Controversial, powerful, yet engaging, this volume will appeal to a wide range of readers. Kitcher's nuanced analysis and authoritative conclusion will interest countless scientists as well as all readers of science--scholars and laypersons alike.

1991年基进出版社羅永生译本重版出来！
在謊言充斥的世界，真相就是一種威脅；在黑暗之中，磊落真誠地生活就是反抗；活成一個有尊嚴的人，就是所有政治力量的基礎。無權勢者的力量，微小但確切地照亮了黑暗。

The Power of the Powerless (Czech: Moc bezmocných) is an expansive political essay written in October 1978 by the Czech dramatist, political dissident and later politician, Václav Havel. The essay dissects the nature of the communist regime of the time, life within such a regime and how by their very nature such regimes can create dissidents of ordinary citizens. The essay goes on to discuss ideas and possible actions by loose communities of individuals linked by a common cause, such as Charter 77. Officially suppressed, the essay was circulated in samizdat form and translated into multiple languages. It became a manifesto for dissent in Czechoslovakia, Poland and other communist regimes.